• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

chiffchaff identification, I need help (1 Viewer)

chiffchaff13

Well-known member
I need your help. two of these this morning Feb 03 2015 in the park (Marseille south of France), they really look bizarre, not normal chiffchaffs ? thank you in advance !
 

Attachments

  • _JL26258.jpg
    _JL26258.jpg
    434 KB · Views: 181
  • _JL26262.jpg
    _JL26262.jpg
    423 KB · Views: 136
Definitely Chiffchaffs, but the black smear at base of bill seems to stem from some sticky substance adhering to the feathers. Can't figure what.......

Peter
 
These pictures have either been manipulated or the photographic equipment is faulty or poor and as such any id based on colour is invalid. In 35 years I've never seen a chiffchaff with that acrid geen colour ?
 
Last edited:
These pictures have either been manipulated or the photographic equipment is faulty or poor and as such any id based on colour is invalid. In 35 years I've never seen a chiffchaff with that acrid geen colour ?

Maybe marginally bright but overall looks perfectly fine to me. Definitely a chiffchaff
 
Definitely Chiffchaffs, but the black smear at base of bill seems to stem from some sticky substance adhering to the feathers. Can't figure what.......

Peter

The black at the base of the bill and jet black legs ? are a consequence of too much contrast and the whole image looks over highlighted. OK it may have been grubbing around in a jar of tar but did it dip its legs in for good measure ? Have you ever heard of Chiffchaff legs being described as jet black ? I think not.
 
The pics just extremely contrasty due to the lighting. Overall it looks nothing other than a normal chiffchaff- I really don't see much up with the leg colour at all. Besides which, there's no alternative option. The black at the base of the bill is just dirt.
 
Think the legs look shiny black (as does the black on the face) for the same reason the rest of the pic looks odd - contrast of the photo all wrong for whatever reason (camera settings or post processing presumably). The shadows under the vegetation are also disproportionately 'black' imo.

Agree it ends up just being a Chiffchaff though - although it should be noted Iberian Chiffchaff is definitely a possibility in this area (the primaries on the far side of the bird do look a bit longer perhaps, the super is quite strong, and yes it is bright), but as the colours are fairly up the creek, can't really comment further beyond that ;)

The black on the face is most likely to be pollen from whatever exotic/semi-exotic plants it has been plunging its head into to feed in (on insects or the pollen itself) I'm thinking.
 
Last edited:
It's almost ripe time for Iberians to figure in that region. But, again, something wrong with the colour balance in these images...
 
I was only wondering why the black around the beek, not entering a photo competition with world specialists (true, the thumbnails pictures are overcontrasted, I should have checked this). I won't bother anyone again. thank you for those who did try and help.
 
I wouldn't worry too much about any implied criticism of the pics - it just gave another dimension for people to argue over ;)

Cameras do funny things sometimes. It is true that images are odd, there is no getting away from that, although it appears they still are Chiffchaff, it has made it trickier to see what is going on tbh ... and potentially more interesting (would've been interesting to see what it actually looked like - but I imagine correcting the contrast must be too tricky now).

Google "chiffchaff pollen on head" to see some similar examples.

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=c...v&sa=X&ei=gsrRVLTLHei67gboqYGIAg&ved=0CC4QsAQ


(And it's not a photo competition, but there are some world specialists on here ;) )
 
thank you "Dantheman", a reliable and sound advice is what I expected. I have looked at the photos on the link you sent, this is exactly what "mine" looked like. unfortunately poor morning light under the trees has made me use a flashlight which has modified the shadows and overall tone. the bird looked fine though. thank you !
 
I echo Dan's comments Chiffchaff13, don't be discouraged from 'bothering' again with more questions, Birdforum has a wide range of people on it, nearly everyone likes to help, though we often like to have a 'lively' ;) exchange of opinions too !
 
Not everyone has a flashy camera and the best knowledge on how to get the sharpest photos from them either. Mine are a lot worse so don't worry about posting again.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 9 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top