mickporter said:This time also compare them with Zeiss. (Although looking at the Zeiss forum above here, it appears to be mainly moans and negative stuff posted!)
...
One of the great dangers with posting on here like this is that each particular model has its enthusiasts. Its like cameras. People on the Fuji camera forums have a huge rivalary with guys from the Olympus forum. Each will go to great lengths to defend his or her favourite brand. Wars often break out there. To a Fuji fanatic even if they brought out a matchbox with a pinhole in it, so long as it was branded Fuji it would be the best camera in the World. Far better than anything Olympus or Cannon could invent. HEHEHE.
Ragna said:Mick i am suprised you could not see any difference between the Opticron and Nikon82 as the nikon is twice the price.Iam sure if you had view in difficult lighting conditions then you would notice a difference.You may also like to try the Leica APO77(In Focus dont stock Leica)these with a 30x eyepiece are very well priced at the moment.The 30x eyepice i think is a far better option for digiscoping.
No, Graham - you're doing what we all should be, I think: getting out there and looking for the little critters!Ragna said:Steve sorry must try and keep up with developments.
scampo said:They're doing themselves no favours, are they? But maybe they think they know what they're doing. It seems to me that in the HR66ED and ES80, they had the basis of a pair of real winners, but instead they dilute the effect by launching yet another scope - with a non-retro fittable zoom, too (if that makes sense).
I feel a bit of a traitor but it's not quite as it seems - it's the best compromise. My son's keen on digiscoping and wanted a bigger objective than his Swaro 65 offers (and which my brother was keen to buy). A good offer on the Zeiss was too good to resist and we kind of "share" anyhow! The Nikon is still in for repair so I'm waiting for its return to compare it more thoroughly with the Zeiss. They're all top scopes, though - who'd really complain with any of them? After so many years managing with an old s/h Kowa 60mm I feel pretty lucky to have the choice!steverowe said:After all that praise for the Nikon, you go and swap it for a Zeiss.
Steve
scampo said:We can't get used to any other baked beans, either! I do wonder why more people don't go for the Nikon. One look through it and it's so clear that it is a top level piece of kit.
scampo said:Not a penny - I still have the Nikon!!! It's with them for repair at the moment, as I say. When it resurfaces either my son or I will use it and the other one gets the Zeiss! Aren't we the lucky ones, eh?
What I can say is that I am truly enjoying the Zeiss's exceptionally wide fov as I don't have a fixed 30x for it (and I'm not sure it's even needed with such a wide fov in the first place).
william j clive said:Just to clarify things a little, Scampo, are you in a position to truthfully deny that Steve Ingraham is a new work colleague of yours? ) Clive
william j clive said:Are Zeiss busy recruiting Nikon buffs or what? Leif and I are still waiting for job offers.
I had only been superficially aware of that name until a couple of days ago when I joined the Yahoo digiscoping forum. On the same day, Mr Ingraham also joined and directed us all to view his digiscoped images onhis web site. Well, he gave the wrong link and I (and many others, I should think) ended up surfing his family biography site - you should take a look sometime. So, I know quite a lot about him, but not of him. He's an interesting character as you'll discover if you have a peek!william j clive said:Just to clarify things a little, Scampo, are you in a position to truthfully deny that Steve Ingraham is a new work colleague of yours? )
Clive
Ragna said:Pete If they did i did'nt notice it,but then i read it in Smiths(didnt dare buy a copy cause if you lot ad found out id ave been banished from bird forum)So only read the bits that mattered like how good the Swarovski was(only joking bit of a fan of the Leica for the price).