Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!
Discover the ZEISS Digital Nature Hub

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Optical differences between 42s SLC 'neu' and final production

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Wednesday 21st October 2020, 12:01   #1
SeldomPerched
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: England
Posts: 627
Optical differences between 42s SLC 'neu' and final production

This might be hard to answer as I'm comparing a 7x neu (=new) model with the latest, just discontinued 8x and 10x models.

Is it possible to find out what changes or improvements were made in the SLC x42 line between my final production 7x42 SLC and the restyled final production 8 and 10x42.

The 7x42 is very highly regarded - and also quite heavy. The other two are also highly regarded but lighter, with the 10x in particular being lighter and shorter by a small amount than the 8x. As an aside, all three are among the most reassuringly solid and comfortable binoculars to my taste.

Somehow the look of the view seems different with the 7x, leaving aside the obvious difference in magnification. I can't explain what it is, so any facts about changes in colour, types of glass and coatings used and so on would be great to know. For what it's worth none of them has competitive close focusing and that doesn't worry me.

Thank you,

Tom

Last edited by SeldomPerched : Wednesday 21st October 2020 at 12:04.
SeldomPerched is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 21st October 2020, 13:39   #2
NDhunter
Registered User
 
NDhunter's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Northern plains
Posts: 4,502
The newer SLC models have HD glass, the Neu does not, so they should be better with chromatic abberation.
The SLC Neu models have some of the best and similar lens coatings, and all have dielectric prism coatings,
so that part should be similar.

The SLC Neu models are very good, I have experience with several.

Jerry
NDhunter is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 22nd October 2020, 00:39   #3
John A Roberts
Registered User
 
John A Roberts's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Perth
Posts: 746
For an overview . . .

The original x42 SLC was introduced in 1992 in 7x42 and 10x42. Both remained in production until 2010, when the all new x42 SLC was introduced in 8x42 and 10x42

In relation to what’s known about the optics:
• The original design had an objective of 3 elements in 2 groups (1 + 2 focusing); and an eyepiece of 5 elements in 3 groups (2 + 1 + 2)

• The current design has an objective of 4 elements in 3 groups (1 + 2 + 1 focusing); and an eyepiece of 5 elements in 3 groups (2 + 2 + 1)

And as Jerry indicates, the new model includes HD glass - it’s the third lens in the objective group
(see Clay Taylor of Swarovski in the post of 9th October 2013 at: http://www.opticstalk.com/difference...579_page1.html )


The more complex pattern objective of the 2010 model is also used on other current models:
the EL Swarovision of 2010, the EL Range of 2011, the x56 SLC of 2013, and the recently released NL

- - - -

In terms of coatings:
- Swarobright dielectric prism coating was introduced on the 7x42 by September 2000 (not on #D7027 61277, on #D7033 62504),
and on the 10x42 by February 2001 (not on #D7039 65033, on #D7103 70724) *

- Swaroclean low friction external lens coating was introduced by September 2007 (not on #D7708 56693, on #D7734 61825) *

- And at the start of 2009, the Swaroclean anti-reflective coatings were updated on all product lines to the current ‘paper white’ version
(see post #29 by Dale Forbes of Swarovski at: https://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=155446 )


* The presence of Swarobright and Swaroclean is not indicated on the units but was marked on the box labels at the times of introduction
The dating is based on my observation of the labels

- - - -

The neu style body covering was introduced on all of the SLC line from the start of 2005 (from #D7501 xxxxx), and is the last style used on the original SLC’s
For an intending purchaser, it’s a convenient visual indicator of the presence of Swarobright. The multi layer coating results in a less yellow image than the earlier silver coating,
which was deficient in the blue portion of the spectrum


See an image from the current SLC catalogue (which can be found at: https://aa.swarovskioptik.com/custom...d=10007.466400 )
It shows the various coverings from front to rear:

2013 x42 SLC - current version of the new model (all-over two texture rubber covering - although the image seems to show two colours, it's all the same colour)

2010 x42 SLC HD - all new model (forrest green with blackened exposed metal in the bridge area)

2005 x42 SLC neu - last version of the original model (forrest green with black rubber in the bridge area)

1997 x42 SLC - upgraded covering (it lacks the ‘shoulders’ of the original covering, also either green or black)

1992 x42 SLC - the original model and covering (either green or black)


John
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Original SLC x42.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	171.0 KB
ID:	740451  Click image for larger version

Name:	SLC HD x42.jpg
Views:	22
Size:	195.7 KB
ID:	740452  Click image for larger version

Name:	SLC x42 coverings progression.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	136.4 KB
ID:	740453  

Last edited by John A Roberts : Thursday 22nd October 2020 at 02:45.
John A Roberts is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 23rd October 2020, 21:39   #4
SeldomPerched
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: England
Posts: 627
Thank you, Jerry and John; much appreciated. I feel very fortunate with these SLCs as they tick so many boxes. Every day that I use this 7 it feels like I have something rare and little appreciated at large, though of course in present company they are far from unappreciated. They are really growing on me. I can almost sense the absence of HD glass compared with the others but only in immediate comparison, not when out of the house using them properly.

Not having got the hang of the various Swarovski numbering systems, John, do you mind reminding me of the date of manufacture of the 7x42 SLC Neu no. D801384600, as I'm interested to work out how close to final production it was made? It has been well looked after and came to me with all its bits and pieces in the box. You remember it was a number you had noted down but I can't now trace the thread you mentioned it in. (Sorry!) As for the weight, I'm quickly getting used to it and it balances excellently and has great grippability. As do the other 42s of the last of the line series.

Best wishes,

Tom
SeldomPerched is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 23rd October 2020, 21:43   #5
NDhunter
Registered User
 
NDhunter's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Northern plains
Posts: 4,502
Tom:
The number you show says the year of mfr. for the SLC Neu is 2010, you find that by adding the number
30 to the first 2 digits of the ser. #. 80 +30= 2010.
That means it is a late production, and among the last of the model series.

Enjoy in good health.

Jerry
NDhunter is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 23rd October 2020, 21:53   #6
Tringa45
Registered User

 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Cologne, Germany
Posts: 473
The 42 mm SLC HDs and their successors were completely different optical designs from the SLC Neu and their predecessors.
A significant difference is that the latest models have a -ve focussing lens (moves towards the objectives when focussing to infinity) and the 7x42 SLC has a +ve focussing lens (moves away from the objective focussing to infinity). This is also one of the differences between the original EL (+ve.) and the EL SV (-ve.).
One cannot say that one or the other principle is superior. The 42 mm Zeiss SFs also have +ve. focussing lenses.

John
Tringa45 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 24th October 2020, 08:45   #7
Ries
Registered User

 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 393
Quote:
Originally Posted by John A Roberts View Post
For an overview . . .



John
Great overview, thanks!
__________________
Richard
Ries is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PC app for PDF production njlarsen Computers, Birding Software And The Internet 6 Sunday 17th March 2019 00:45
Optical differences on Ultravid HDs and Ultravid BLs? Douglas Martins Leica 21 Friday 1st August 2014 13:50
Optical Differences - Ultra HD 42mm vs. 36 mm james holdsworth Bushnell - Bausch & Lomb 5 Tuesday 1st April 2014 23:21
Final, final (no, really) Namibian query hollis_f Bird Identification Q&A 9 Monday 8th January 2007 11:53
Optical Differences in 20-60x vs. Fixed Magnification Marley Nikon 2 Monday 23rd May 2005 19:59

{googleads}

Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Help support BirdForum

Page generated in 0.10688090 seconds with 22 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:29.