• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

What Lens for Forest Photography (1 Viewer)

portnoy58

Well-known member
I happily use a Panasonic GF1 for digiscoping and am contemplating buying a new lens as we are travelling to the Philippines and will be birding mainly in forests where digiscoping becomes much more difficult. There are a number of Panasonic lenses available: the 45-175, 45-200 or the 100-300 mm all of which should suit. Can anyone advise on what the best option for me would be; from digiscoping I sense that MFT 300mm (600 mm equivalent) might be more than necessary for forest situations. Any other lens recommendations? Many thanks
 
I would go for the 100-300 which I use on the GH2. I have read (but no personal experience) that the 45-200 is quite soft at the long end, to a larger degree than the 100-300.

Do upgrade the firmware on the 100-300 if it does not come pre-updated. Also, when used with the GH2, I find that the best process is to shoot 3-4 series of 2-3 shots each (I use medium burst rate) because at the end, one usually is sharper than the others.

Niels
 
I would go for the 100-300 which I use on the GH2. I have read (but no personal experience) that the 45-200 is quite soft at the long end, to a larger degree than the 100-300.

Do upgrade the firmware on the 100-300 if it does not come pre-updated. Also, when used with the GH2, I find that the best process is to shoot 3-4 series of 2-3 shots each (I use medium burst rate) because at the end, one usually is sharper than the others.

Niels

Yhx Niels I don't think the GF1 allows me to do much in setting burst rates but thanks for the advice and comment. Gerry
 
Warning! This thread is more than 11 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top