I doubt that it would be one of this year's (2019) hatchlings in mid April. My guess would be born last year.
I'd like to know why males are so infrequently seen?
During my time in Russia, Adders were common on my local patch but in 5 years, only two or three males were seen, the majority being mid sized females and very young animals.
Lovely photos Andy
Well, in my opinion (others are available):
1. Can't tell, the critical bit is concealed beneath the snake!
2. Female.
3. Male for me: that looks like an evenly tapered tail. Big Adder!
4. Female top, male bottom.
5. Female.
'S not easy!
John
In young adders it is more easy to check the "nose"shields for sexing.
In males, the borders of the rostrale and the nasals have a strong contrasting border, while in females the shields are unicolored.
Hmm,
when you say 'evenly tapered', I thought the males had a skinnier, longer tail, the tail on 3 is fairly shortish?
I try to visualise the snake in a straight line. On a female Adder there is a distinct step between the main body and tail but on a male there is a continuous taper from further up the snake down into the tail region. (See photo below from Pulborough last year).
I liked Vipersgarden's tip but noted that even on his demonstration photos the difference seems to be a matter of degree rather than an absolute. The female scales were not concolorous, displaying the same border as in the male but admittedly with much less contrast.
John
Another view of the same snake. Contrasting borders on rostral scales = male according to Vipersgarden. And me.
Also, what I see on the tail end is a smooth taper, not a distinct step as in a female (your no. 5 shows the female tail really well: its like the shoulders on a wine bottle). :t:
Have you got a closer view (or a crop at a pinch) of your No. 3's head?
John