• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Green-bellied Hummingbird (1 Viewer)

wintibird

André Weiss
Opus Editor
Discussion thread for Green-bellied Hummingbird. If you would like to add a comment, click the Post Reply button.

S&M only accepts this species. H&M and Clements (until the last update) split it into Green-bellied and Copper-tailed. Now it's lumped again in Clements. So one to lump?

André
 
Discussion thread for Green-bellied Hummingbird. If you would like to add a comment, click the Post Reply button.

S&M only accepts this species. H&M and Clements (until the last update) split it into Green-bellied and Copper-tailed. Now it's lumped again in Clements. So one to lump?

André

You really looked closely at this one, to discover that clements in the latest online update had lumped: Avibase does not list that. The funny thing is that the entry you link to really already looks like a lumped version, stating the two groups.

Anyway, I would go along with lumping this, but for completeness, there need to be a link under taxonomy to the sacc page http://www.museum.lsu.edu/~remsen/SACCprop168.html and a sentence in the taxonomy section stating that even though the species have been split into two species according to some authorities, the SACC seems to agree that the correct number of species is likely to be either 1 or probably more than 2 ...

It is a mess, we must hope that someone clears it up.

It will be a great problem to device a search for the lumped species which finds most of the pictures in the gallery (if there were any ;) ).

Niels
 
Last edited:
You really looked closely at this one, to discover that clements in the latest online update had lumped: Avibase does not list that. The funny thing is that the entry you link to really already looks like a lumped version, stating the two groups.

It wasn't me actually, Delia did the taxonomy entry based on Clements and felt that there is something wrong...;)
I will get a go at this and lump the two articles with the link you proposed.

André
 
Warning! This thread is more than 15 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top