• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Barnegat,NJ,USA 2018-3, Some Gull (1 Viewer)

and_475

Well-known member
Any pointers appreciated.
Any suggestions for good Gull ID book ?

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Picture25-13.jpg
    Picture25-13.jpg
    126.6 KB · Views: 60
Herring Gull there. As far as field Guide... Sibley's or Stokes is a good general bird guide. Most gulls can be ID from those. If you want a specialized Gull guide, hopefully someone else can help you there.
 
American Herring Gull.

As for specialized Gull books that cover North American species you have the following main options:
1 - "The Bible": Gulls of Europe, Asia and North America (Helm Identification Guides)
2 - Covering North and South American species: Peterson Reference Guides to Gulls of the Americas
3 - All gull species of the World (same author as the 1st book above), in a more concise style: Gulls of the World: A Photographic Guide

As said above, the more general field guides are usually enough for ID purposes, but if you have a special interest in gulls I'd certainly suggest one of the above.
As for documenting gulls photographically for later ID you should always get shots (whenever possible, of course) of the following:
- full bird
- close up of the head (full side view)
- close up of the wing tips
- open wing shots from above and below
- open tail shot
Having photos of these features will enable you to ID any gull species. If that's not possible, a photo of the full bird is preferable than a partial one. Also, getting other birds/gulls in the same photo might help in some cases.
Have fun! :)
 
Last edited:
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top