• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Principal component analysis of avian hind limb and foot morphometrics (1 Viewer)

Fred Ruhe

Well-known member
Netherlands
Amanda R. Falk, James C. Lamsdell and Enpu Gong, 2020

Principal component analysis of avian hind limb and foot morphometrics and the relationship between ecology and phylogeny

Paleobiology (advance online publication)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/pab.2020.39
https://www.cambridge.org/core/jour...nd-phylogeny/144C8D8E6E3ECD3A119A3AE7A5401FC2

Abstract:

Principal component analysis has been used to test for similarities in ecology and life habit between modern and fossil birds; however, the two main portions of the hind limb—the foot and the long bone elements—have not been examined separately. We examine the potential links between morphology, ecology, and phylogeny through a synthesis of phylogenetic paleoecological methods and morphospace analysis. Both hind limb morphologies and species’ ecologies exhibit extreme phylogenetic clumping, although these patterns are at least partially explainable by a Brownian motion style of evolution. Some morphologies are strongly correlated with particular ecologies, while some ecologies are occupied by a variety of morphologies. Within the morphospace analyses, the length of the hallux (toe I) is the most defining characteristic of the entire hind limb. The foot and hind limb are represented on different axes when all measurements are considered in an analysis, suggesting that these structures undergo morphological change separately from each other. Early birds tend to cluster together, representing an unspecialized basal foot morphotype and a hind limb reliant on hip-driven, not knee-driven, locomotion. Direct links between morphology, ecology, and phylogeny are unclear and complicated and may be biased due to sample size (~60 species). This study should be treated as a preliminary analysis that further studies, especially those examining the vast diversity of modern birds, can build upon.

Enjoy,

Fred
 
FIGURE 1. Composite phylogeny of sampled avian species, compiled from Jarvis et al. (2014), Garcia-R et al. (2014), Sun et al. (2017), Baker et al. (2007), Pereira and Baker (2008), Gibson and Baker (2012), Barth et al. (2013), Mackiewicz (2019), O’Connor et al. (2009), and Wang et al. (2014, 2017). Hind limb morphology is indicated via coloring on the branches, while species ecological assignment is shown via coloring on the tips alongside the species name.

Fred
 

Attachments

  • Eco-Phyl.jpg
    Eco-Phyl.jpg
    125.9 KB · Views: 7
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top