MJB
Well-known member
I believe that word order priority would still apply to Vini (Vidi, Vici).
...or even Veni, vidi, vici....
MJB
PS What did the Romans ever do for us?
I believe that word order priority would still apply to Vini (Vidi, Vici).
The only other 'Bolborhynchus' that has sequences in GenBank is 'B.' aymara, which is in Psilopsiagon in recent classifications.I forgot, Bolborhynchus is paraphyletic with Nannopsittaca albeit (or though?) only one Bolborhynchus species is sampled. It's maybe too soon to merge Nann. into Bolb. Do you know if there is a study in which all species of Bolborhynchus are included?
Invented Latin, without which we'd have no Latin names 8-PPS What did the Romans ever do for us?
The only other 'Bolborhynchus' that has sequences in GenBank is 'B.' aymara, which is in Psilopsiagon in recent classifications.
There are barcodes for all the seven spp of the group in BOLD, however (3 Bolborhynchus species, 2 Nannopsittaca species, 2 Psilopsiagon species--albeit the sequences of B. lineola and N. dachilleae are not (yet) publicly available). Identification trees suggest B. orbygnesius and B. ferrugineifrons are close to each other (uncorrected distance < 1%), but not particularly close to B. lineola (which is the type), nor to Nannopsittaca. In fact, these two seem closer to Psilopsiagon.
I've attached an ID tree (produced by submitting a panychlora seq to the BOLD ID engine), and a rapidly bootstrapped ML tree (based on the publicly available seqs, thus no lineola and no dachilleae).
Ridgway 1912 in the same publication with Nannopsittaca Ridgway also created Grammopsittica for P. lineola.
https://books.google.com/books?id=wDjPAAAAMAAJ&dq=Nannopsittaca+lineola&source=gbs_navlinks_s . Page 100.
...As well as Psilopsiagon for Psittacus aurifrons 'Wagler' = Lesson 1830.Ridgway 1912 in the same publication with Nannopsittaca Ridgway also created Grammopsittica for P. lineola.
https://books.google.com/books?id=wDjPAAAAMAAJ&dq=Nannopsittaca+lineola&source=gbs_navlinks_s . Page 100.
Nothing in GenBank, nothing in BOLD, and I find nothing using Google either. So I can't help on this one, I'm afraid.Trichoglossus rubiginosus
Nothing in GenBank, nothing in BOLD, and I find nothing using Google either. So I can't help on this one, I'm afraid.
[this] ?Always in my search for available names.
In the Consp. Gen. Avium of Bonaparte :
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/141467#page/25/mode/1up
The binomial name listed under the genus Triclaria is ''Psittacus cyanogaster Vieillot ,1817 " , while the name currently used is Triclaria malachitacea (Spix ,1824).
Would I miss an episode ?