bob saxton
Member
Hi All
I know the Olympus 50-200mm zoom, with silent wave motor, is really popular among bird photographers, especially with the 1.4x converter. I have one, with an e620 body. I'm getting great shots at, eg, f8 or wider, but I find I'm disappointed with the resolution at the widest aperture at full zoom (even without the converter). The focusing on both camera and lens has been corrected by Olympus (it was backfocusing initially). But testing after the kit came back from Oly's German repair shop has left me thinking there's a resolution issue (I THINK it's resolution, not focus). I've done tests on newsprint. What I would like to know is, is a little softness at this extreme to be expected? It's on birds too, not just newspapers. I had always understood that at the widest aperture ANY zoom at maximum focal length would be less satisfactory than when the lens is stopped down. Then I started reading satisfied users saying that their 50-200 was sharp at all apertures. I'd be interested to have feedback on this. I'm happy to work around the lens's limitations -- so long as I'm not getting softer results from other copies of the same lens. Since I bought the lens from Argos, there isn't a dealer I can talk to. (I won't bore people with photos of the Independent on Sunday, unless I hear that this is what you'd like to see!) Thank you in advance for your feedback.
Bob
I know the Olympus 50-200mm zoom, with silent wave motor, is really popular among bird photographers, especially with the 1.4x converter. I have one, with an e620 body. I'm getting great shots at, eg, f8 or wider, but I find I'm disappointed with the resolution at the widest aperture at full zoom (even without the converter). The focusing on both camera and lens has been corrected by Olympus (it was backfocusing initially). But testing after the kit came back from Oly's German repair shop has left me thinking there's a resolution issue (I THINK it's resolution, not focus). I've done tests on newsprint. What I would like to know is, is a little softness at this extreme to be expected? It's on birds too, not just newspapers. I had always understood that at the widest aperture ANY zoom at maximum focal length would be less satisfactory than when the lens is stopped down. Then I started reading satisfied users saying that their 50-200 was sharp at all apertures. I'd be interested to have feedback on this. I'm happy to work around the lens's limitations -- so long as I'm not getting softer results from other copies of the same lens. Since I bought the lens from Argos, there isn't a dealer I can talk to. (I won't bore people with photos of the Independent on Sunday, unless I hear that this is what you'd like to see!) Thank you in advance for your feedback.
Bob