If the M7 8x30 and the MHG 8x30 are that close in specifications it makes you wonder why the MHG is so much more expensive. Where did the extra money go? They both have ED glass. The MHG does have a field flattener lens but does that make it worth twice the price of the M7? The initial reviews are saying the M7 is sharper. I don't see the point of the new 8x30 MHG. Time will tell us more I guess.
If the M7 8x30 and the MHG 8x30 are that close in specifications it makes you wonder why the MHG is so much more expensive. Where did the extra money go? They both have ED glass. The MHG does have a field flattener lens but does that make it worth twice the price of the M7? The initial reviews are saying the M7 is sharper. I don't see the point of the new 8x30 MHG. Time will tell us more I guess.
Better build quality, magnesium alloy frame, field flatteners and a .3 degree bigger FOV. I guess that is worth $650.00 more.
That's an interesting first impression, though perhaps not an entirely fair comparison by putting it against the Swaro EL. I think we all could guess which way that one was going to turn out...
What will be more interesting for people like me, who have the Monarch 7 8x30, will be some worthwhile comparisons with that model. I'll bet I'm not alone in wondering whether it'll be worth the (considerably more) money to trade up to the Monarch HG.
Or the new Swarovski CL's. I think that would be it's direct competitor. The HG's will probably be a good jump from the M7's and they would be worth it if they improve glare control over the M7's. I am kind of surprised Nikon priced the 30mm HG's the same as the 42mm. The 30mm M7's are less than the 42mm M7's. The smaller aperture Swarovski's like the 8x32 SV are less expensive than the 8.5X42 SV. Even with the smaller glass the manufacturing costs is probably about the same though.And the Monarch 7s are made in China while the Monarch HGs are made in Japan which also will affect their prices.
Bob
Bob,
Are they really made in Japan?
Andy W.
Or the new Swarovski CL's. I think that would be it's direct competitor. The HG's will probably be a good jump from the M7's and they would be worth it if they improve glare control over the M7's. I am kind of surprised Nikon priced the 30mm HG's the same as the 42mm. The smaller aperture Swarovski's like the 8x32 SV are less expensive than the 8.5X42 SV.