• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Unknown songbirds Ontario canada (1 Viewer)

Not sure on the first but the second is not a B & W Warbler. There's no yellow in that species.
 
The image birdnut links to shows the buffy colors concentrated on the flank and the side of the head, a different pattern compared to the OP image. It also shows stripes going much further down the flanks than the OP image. Given that there are a number of species with some stripes on the flanks and especially near the front, what makes this a B&W rather than one of the others?

Niels
 
The image birdnut links to shows the buffy colors concentrated on the flank and the side of the head, a different pattern compared to the OP image. It also shows stripes going much further down the flanks than the OP image. Given that there are a number of species with some stripes on the flanks and especially near the front, what makes this a B&W rather than one of the others?

Niels

It’s a fair question. I’m not 100% sure on it but it looks ok for baww. I don’t think anything else would look quite this white for one thing. Pine is probably the closest other option I can think of and from what I can see from the picture the bill looks too thin and pointy. The suggestion of streaks on the utcs and white under tail feathers is consistent with baww. I admit I didn’t try to rule everything out through extensive analysis but I don’t think it’s BLBW or CMWA and I’m not sure what else should even be considered in my opinion. I just get a BAWW impression. The face pattern looks pretty good albeit not a good picture to show all the details clearly.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top