Idle Valley Birder
An Idle Valley Birder
Dogs on Nature Reserves.
Dog chips is a great suggestion
Sorry George but I cant answer any of your questions as I was becoming more and more confused and even embarrassed for the lady telephone operator as the conversation went on.
I know the police are very busy and that maybe dogs attacking a grown men is way down on their priority list but the least one should expect from the police is that they treat you with respect when they tell you the bad news.
'Preferring instead to take the easy way out by believing the lying dog walker over me. :C
Taking time to explain why the police told me it's not illegal for a dog to attack and frighten you would also be nice, especially as many government web sites state. "Dangerous Dogs Act 1991. - If a dog is dangerously out of control in a public place – the owner or the person in charge of the dog is guilty of an offence" It does NOT! have to bite you....
If the dog also bit you. Then they are "guilty of an aggravated offence" under the same act.
Thanks for the advice regarding sending it to both forces George. Will do!
Hope I don't get two more sets of crass insensitive reply's for my trouble. :C
http://www.avaaz.org/en/petition/An...p_Control_or_Ban_dogs_on_Nature_Reserves_NOW/
Why didn't they know which force had spoken to her? Why didn't they know where the incident took place? Why did she then refer to an Investigation report... Seriously, what was on the 'Investigation' Report? Why were you discussing the report with a telephone operator and why did she have access to it? Who was she to specifically tell you she wasn't qualified and then have a debate with you?
It reeks of pathetic incompetence at best, plain idleness, or worse, simply coming down to the arbitrary judgement of the telephone operator. You were, after all, referred immediately to complaining (I should send it to both Humberside and Lincolnshire forces just to be sure you get a satisfactory reply:t rather than being able to speak to a helpful, real police officer as you experienced on your previous call. <snip>
It's an absolute shambles, an embarrassing disgrace. And it's not just you getting this banal and incoherent response - no one on here seems remotely surprised. I'm not either.
Sorry to be so cynical but dog chips in 2016 good news... :-O:-O:-O:-O
Dog chips is a great suggestion
Sorry George but I cant answer any of your questions as I was becoming more and more confused and even embarrassed for the lady telephone operator as the conversation went on.
I know the police are very busy and that maybe dogs attacking a grown men is way down on their priority list but the least one should expect from the police is that they treat you with respect when they tell you the bad news.
'Preferring instead to take the easy way out by believing the lying dog walker over me. :C
Taking time to explain why the police told me it's not illegal for a dog to attack and frighten you would also be nice, especially as many government web sites state. "Dangerous Dogs Act 1991. - If a dog is dangerously out of control in a public place – the owner or the person in charge of the dog is guilty of an offence" It does NOT! have to bite you....
If the dog also bit you. Then they are "guilty of an aggravated offence" under the same act.
Thanks for the advice regarding sending it to both forces George. Will do!
Hope I don't get two more sets of crass insensitive reply's for my trouble. :C
http://www.avaaz.org/en/petition/An...p_Control_or_Ban_dogs_on_Nature_Reserves_NOW/
Last edited: