-
Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.
Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
1/Lancashire today, Medium size brown Job (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter johno147uk
- Start date
:t:
Cristian Mihai
Cristian Mihai
Skylark indeed.
chris butterworth
aka The Person Named Above
Nope. Sky Lark.:smoke:
Chris
Chris
Stuart Darbyshire
45th generation Northern
you'll get told off Chris!!!!
50 lines and no computer until the weekend......
johno147uk
Well-known member
I hope this helps your confusion.
Compound Names
In general, a compound word is a combination of two words that in theory could be spelled as one word, as two words, or as two words hyphenated (e.g., Woodpigeon, Wood-Pigeon, or Wood Pigeon. A fourth alternative spelling of bird names is to follow the hyphen with a lowercase letter (e.g., Wood-pigeon). The problem is complicated by the use of variant spellings over many years. For example, Audubon used hyphens freely (as in Meadow-lark), in cases where now single words are used. Now, some American ornithologists, in particular, use hyphens to define sets of species presumed to be closely related, for example Wood-Pewee and Ground-Dove. Go directly to On Hyphens and Phylogeny for the IOC's view on this practice.
The IOC committee adopted the following spelling rules:
A. Single words.
In keeping with the trend toward greater use of single words that improve distinctiveness for the species, compound names are best spelled as single words:
IF the second word is “bird” (e.g., Bluebird, Tropicbird, Secretarybird) or its equivalent (e.g., Woodcock, Waterhen); or
IF the second word is a body part of a bird (e.g., Hookbill, Bufflehead, Yellowlegs); or
IF the name describes a birds call or song (e.g., Chickadee, Dickcissel, Poorwill, Killdeer); or
IF the second word describes a birds behavior or activity (e.g., Flycatcher, Roadrunner, Honeyeater); or
NOTE: The only exception to the above cases is to use a hyphen if otherwise the name would be hard to pronounce or would look odd (e.g., White-eye, Wattle-eye, Thick-knee, Huet-huet, Chuck-wills-widow). Whip-poor-will was deemed borderline and the committee decided to follow perceived general usage.
IF the second word is a kind of bird (e.g., Nighthawk, Bushtit, Waterthrush, Meadowlark), but the taxon is not a member of the bird family named.
For example, a Meadowlark is not a Lark; a Cuckooshrike is not a Shrike. Thus the name should not be spelled as two words without a hyphen (e.g., Meadow Lark), or spelled with a hyphen followed by a capital letter (e.g., Cuckoo-Shrike). Rather, a single word is used except where it would be hard to pronounce or look odd (e.g., Silky-flycatcher, Stone-curlew, Flycatcher-shrike).
Conversely, if the second word is a type of bird and the taxon is deemed to be a member of that bird family, the name would be spelled with two words, either without a hyphen or with a hyphen followed by a capital letter (e.g., Bush Lark, Eagle-Owl). Converting these to single words states, in effect, that the taxon is not in that family but is rather something different. Exceptions have been made in a few cases where long and widespread usage dictates a single word, such as Goldfinch, Skylark, Woodlark, and Sparrowhawk. These and other cases are under review for potential revision.
B. Two words.
The most difficult problem is with compound words that are not to be spelled as single words. The choice in most such cases was whether to hyphenate the two words or not, and this became the single most contentious point in the entire project because the committee members had very different attitudes toward the hyphen.
At one extreme was the position that a hyphen should never be used except when absolutely necessary to clarify pronunciation or make a necessary word connection. Tied to this position were arguments that hyphens tend to violate otherwise ordinary rules of grammar; that common usage usually does not support hyphens; and that hyphens violate the principle that names should be simple.
At the other extreme is the view that hyphens should be used liberally in bird nomenclature to indicate relationships among taxa, and that if two or more taxa have the same last name the words should be hyphenated.
The committee decided that a middle ground was essential. It adopted the following rules for the use and spelling of two-word compound names:
Two words should be used to spell all names not falling within the rules for single-word names.
A hyphen should not be used as a general rule, and both words should begin with capital letters (e.g., Black Tyrant, Screech Owl, Green Pigeon, Storm Petrel, Wood Partridge). This rule is contrary to the broadly used names of Sibley and Monroe (1990) and currently of the AOU. We attempted to use hyphens to denote group names, despite reservations of several committees, but finally rejected the practice for two primary reasons:
In standard English, hyphens should not be used to link a noun with an adjective that modifies it to create a new noun. Rather, compound nouns are formed (Yellowstone) or the two words remain separate but are used as one (French Poodle).
The goal of creating group names by adding hyphens is intrinsically unstable, confusing, and impractical. It requires that we add a hyphen when one species, such as Warbling Vireo, is split into a group of two species (Eastern Warbling-Vireo and Western Warbling-Vireo), and that we remove the hyphen when two such species are lumped. Hyphens then must be added or subtracted in concert with changes in species taxonomy, which only a small group of specialists will be able to track in something approaching real time. Nonornithologists including editors of bird books will not have the ability or time to check the latest taxonomy to use hyphens "correctly" and thus will tend to be out of grace.
Where both nouns are the names of birds or bird families a hyphen should be inserted to signify that the taxon belongs to the family of the second word, not the first (e.g., Eagle-Owl, Nightingale-Thrush). This conforms to correct English use of hyphens.
If a name is of a taxon that is not a member of the stated bird family, the letter after the hyphen should be lowercase to clarify that status (e.g., Flycatcher-shrike). This is a companion to the rule, described above, applicable to single-word names that hyphenates them to avoid confusion, as in Silky-flycatcher or Stone-curlew.
If application of any of the above rules would produce a name that is contrary to long-established and widespread usage, the rule may be modified or not applied. For example, Goldfinch, Skylark, Steamerduck, and Sparrowhawk-all taxa that are within the family name stated and thus do not come within the single-word rules described above-can nevertheless be spelled as single words, despite #1, because of long usage.... Source ioc
chris butterworth
aka The Person Named Above
you'll get told off Chris!!!!
50 lines and no computer until the weekend......
Hah. Watching "Chiloe" Steamer Ducks at moment so I don't care8-P. Sky Lark 'cos it's a Lark, there are no other "Skylark"s to compare it to and, the BOU use Sky Lark. The hyphen/ compound name argument tends to be between those in N America + those of us who speak English. ( That should get some blood pressures soaring :smoke:
)Chris
johno147uk
Well-known member
Johnno that is some work you've put together there.....not sure I understand it still but well played for putting it together. B
Not sure i understand it, sounds a better argument than just saying the BOU writes like this... Steve
