• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

SF 32, First Impressions (1 Viewer)

Troubador

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
After many false predictions and nods and winks for several years, at long last the rumoured and almost mythical SF 32 has surfaced.

After a brief try-out I have to say I was wrong about one fundamental. I have expressed doubts more than once that the kind of balance possessed by SF42 could be repeated in a 32 mm model, but by golly it has. Zeiss’s latest baby weighs pretty much the same as Swarovski’s EL but the balance means the weight almost disappears when you grip it and lift it up. It is long enough to allow a good open-hinge grip with three fingers wrapped around the barrel just under the second bridge and your first finger falling naturally on the focus wheel, just as it does on the 42. By the way my IPD is only 58.5mm so my grip was achieved even with the hinge closed quite a lot.

As leaked a couple of weeks ago, the field of view of the 8x is 155 metres at 1,000 metres, or 465 ft at 1,000 yds, equating to a true angle of view of 8.80 degrees. The view is huge and sharp. Even the 10x has 130 metres at 1,000 metres, so 390 feet at 1,000 yards or 7.40 degrees true angle of view. The close focus distance is stated to be 1.95m for both 8x and 10x but was closer than this on the unit I tried.

In short, this is a worthy follow-up to the 42.

Lee
 

Attachments

  • sfIMG_4333.jpg
    sfIMG_4333.jpg
    83.1 KB · Views: 663
  • IMG_4338 - Red.jpg
    IMG_4338 - Red.jpg
    220.6 KB · Views: 1,176
Last edited:
Thanks for posting Lee! I look forward to your thoughts on it once you had had a thorough 'work out' with it!

Chris
 
After many false predictions and nods and winks for several years, at long last the rumoured and almost mythical SF 32 has surfaced.

After a brief try-out I have to say I was wrong about one fundamental. I have expressed doubts more than once that the kind of balance possessed by SF42 could be repeated in a 32 mm model, but by golly it has. Zeiss’s latest baby weighs pretty much the same as Swarovski’s EL but the balance means the weight almost disappears when you grip it and lift it up. It is long enough to allow a good open-hinge grip with two fingers wrapped around the barrel and the little finger/pinkie resting on the third hinge. Your first finger falls naturally on the focus wheel, just as it does on the 42.

As leaked a couple of weeks ago, the field of view of the 8x is 155 metres at 1,000 metres, or 465 ft at 1,000 yds, equating to a true angle of view of 8.80 degrees. The view is huge and sharp. Even the 10x has 130 metres at 1,000 metres, so 390 feet at 1,000 yards or 7.40 degrees true angle of view. The close focus distance is stated to be 1.95m for both 8x and 10x but was closer than this on the unit I tried.

In short, this is a worthy follow-up to the 42.

Lee
ù

HI!
I've just published the firt technical data on Binomania.it
https://www.binomania.it/zeiss-sf32/
I will receive a specimen of 8X, in the nexd days.
Have a nice week end to all!
Piergiovanni
 
Thanks for posting Lee! I look forward to your thoughts on it once you had had a thorough 'work out' with it!

Chris

Hi Chris

The unit I used was borrowed for a couple of hours. When production standard units become available I hope to get a unit to review but I can imagine there are many reviewers hoping to do the same, not to mention hundreds of dealers world-wide screaming for stock.

Lee
 
Lee. How do the size of the eye cups compare to the SF 8x42? Any problems with black outs? Are the 8x32 SF's as sharp to the edge as the SF 8x42'S? Any RB? Did you get a chance to check CA? 8.8 degree's would be really nice with sharp edges. Thanks.
 
Lee. How do the size of the eye cups compare to the SF 8x42? Any problems with black outs? Are the 8x32 SF's as sharp to the edge as the SF 8x42'S? Any RB? Did you get a chance to check CA? 8.8 degree's would be really nice with sharp edges. Thanks.

Dennis

I didn't closely compare the eyecups of 32 against the 42 but if you are concerned about blackouts when using these without spectacles, take a look at the pic which has a 32 in front of a 42 and the eyecups look very close in size. And don't forget wide fields of view need bigger prisms and lenses and this is dipicted in the animations on the Zeiss website, si the diameter of the optical tube can be expected to be a bit bigger and therefore the eyecups would be too, so I am confident they won't jam too deep into anyone's eye sockets. I had no blackouts with spectacles. Concerning edge sharpness, again I didn't compare 32 with 42 but the 32s were certainly sharp enough for me to identify species of ducks entering the field of view at the edge. Didn't see any RB at all but I have never seen it in a 42. Definitely couldnt see any CA at all, even black tree branches against white clouds.

The fov is knock-out and it feels great in the hand.

Lee
 
Dennis

I didn't closely compare the eyecups of 32 against the 42 but if you are concerned about blackouts when using these without spectacles, take a look at the pic which has a 32 in front of a 42 and the eyecups look very close in size. And don't forget wide fields of view need bigger prisms and lenses and this is dipicted in the animations on the Zeiss website, si the diameter of the optical tube can be expected to be a bit bigger and therefore the eyecups would be too, so I am confident they won't jam too deep into anyone's eye sockets. I had no blackouts with spectacles. Concerning edge sharpness, again I didn't compare 32 with 42 but the 32s were certainly sharp enough for me to identify species of ducks entering the field of view at the edge. Didn't see any RB at all but I have never seen it in a 42. Definitely couldnt see any CA at all, even black tree branches against white clouds.

The fov is knock-out and it feels great in the hand.

Lee
Thanks, Lee. it sure is nice to have someone as knowledgeable as you trying these new Zeiss out for us to help us decide if we want to purchase them. They are sounding great.
 
Thanks, Lee. it sure is nice to have someone as knowledgeable as you trying these new Zeiss out for us to help us decide if we want to purchase them. They are sounding great.

Dennis

Visit the other thread. Henry has spotted that SF32 has an unusual ocular and the focus lens behind the prisms.

No wonder they achieved the balance they were seeking.


Lee
 
Thanks for the impressions and Pics Lee.

It looks very nice.

I won't be giving up my little FL though ... still one of the shortest 32mm binos out there.
 
Dennis

Visit the other thread. Henry has spotted that SF32 has an unusual ocular and the focus lens behind the prisms.

No wonder they achieved the balance they were seeking.


Lee
Lee

That is interesting the way they have all the lenses toward the oculars to achieve the forward balance and make the binoculars feel lighter.
 
So they are both bigger and lighter than "plastic" FLs but have a "heavy" metal body and "heavy" FL glas as well. Impressive.
Do we know where they are manufactured?
 
Lee - sounds like you were very impressed. I have been toying with the idea of getting a 10x32 primarily because I like the small size - that's the reason I didn't purchase a SF x42. I was leaning towards the Swarovski EL 10x32 but I think I'll wait and check out the new SF 10x32.
 
Thanks.
Pretty promising. I think Zeiss went in the right direction going for optical performance instead of tiny size.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top