• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Cyanoloxia Bonaparte, 1850. (1 Viewer)

James Jobling

Well-known member
England
Cyanoloxia Bonaparte 1850, Conspectus Generum Avium, 1 (2), p. 502. All current listings give the type of this genus as Pyrrhula glauco-caerulea Lafresnaye & d'Orbigny, based on the designation by Hellmayr 1938, Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Publications, Zool. Series XIII, Cat. Birds Americas, part XI, p. 105, which also refers to earlier designations of type by elimination by Ridgway 1901, and by Dabbene 1910. However, they all seem to have ignored Bonaparte's own type designation of Loxia caerulea in Bonaparte & Schlegel 1850, Monographie des Loxiens, page vi, which is referred to in the Richmond Card Index. I have quoted these various references in the Key. Does this mean a new genus name for glaucocaerulea or what am I missing?
 
Last edited:
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top