We certainly agree on the importance of function in binoculars. And generally we will agree that some designs are more pleasing to the eye than others. Then I'm reminded of the Latin maxium, "De gustabus non est disputandum." Personal taste really can't be debated. Our designers attempt to bring together both form and function. Sometimes they succeed, and sometimes they don't.
My pique with them is that sometimes they sacrifice function for what appeals to them, what I call the snob appeal. An outstanding example of this is the Nikon LX 10x25. It has superb optics, but function? Try to focus it with your fore finger, the most ergonomically situated appendage we have. With the focus knob located on the end of the bridge, the little finger is more often used. Not convenient.
I have examined the HT very carefully. It is a superb instrument. Have the Terra, Conquest, and HT together and spend some time focusing them. I'll wager there is a subtle difference favoring the Terra and Conquest, and it isn't the cosmetics or optics. John
That designers sometimes come up with the most bizarre 'improvements' and the most hideous 'embellishments' is also something we can agree on.
The little Conquest HD 8x32 I think is a stunningly good piece of kit and if I had the folding green stuff to spare I would get one in a heartbeat.
Lee