I am a relatively new member of Bird Forum, and most frequently admire birds through the range finder of my camera. To date, I have posted well over 300 photos of birds from various parts of the world, and hope to continue to expand my Bird Forum portfolio. I receive many positive comments from bird lovers about my photos, and this gives me great pleasure. I am constantly trying to improve my bird photography skills.
I was recently taken-aback by the removal of two of my posted photos by Bird Forum officials due to the site's policy against photographing nests. I understand the good reasons for this policy, and support it. However, I believe that, to be fair the policy needs to be fine tuned.
The goal of the rule should be to avoid disturbance of the subjects so as not to decrease the probability of reproductive and nesting success. We all want these beautiful and interesting creatures to maintain, and in many cases to increase their populations. Certainly, sneaking up close, even only as close as ~5 m to a nest with young or an adult on eggs should be taboo. The use of flash in such circumstances may make negative impacts even worse. I love birds, and want to keep them around
The two photos of mine that were removed were not of nests at all. They showed the exterior of Red-throated Bee-eater nest holes in a stream-cut bank. One photo was of the bank showing the many holes (no birds), and was taken with telephoto lens at a distance of about 20 meters. The other photo showed an adult perched at the entrance of it's hole, holding an insect in its beak. The bird was about to take the insect into the tunnel to feed to its young at the inner end. The young birds were far into the burrow, and could not be seen from the exterior. This photo was taken with telephoto 13-14 meters from the bird and the opening of its nest hole. Flash was not used for either photo. The birds did not alter their behavior as I approached my shooting position. I do not think that the removal of these photos was fair.
Top bird guides often take serious photographers who use long telephoto lenses to such sites. The individual guiding me in Uganda where these photos were taken was a dedicated bird conservationist who was deeply concerned about the protection of birds. His livelihood depended on healthy bird populations; he would not have wanted to harm the birds.
Why not add a minimum photographing distance to the Bird Forum rule? Any other suggestions?
I was recently taken-aback by the removal of two of my posted photos by Bird Forum officials due to the site's policy against photographing nests. I understand the good reasons for this policy, and support it. However, I believe that, to be fair the policy needs to be fine tuned.
The goal of the rule should be to avoid disturbance of the subjects so as not to decrease the probability of reproductive and nesting success. We all want these beautiful and interesting creatures to maintain, and in many cases to increase their populations. Certainly, sneaking up close, even only as close as ~5 m to a nest with young or an adult on eggs should be taboo. The use of flash in such circumstances may make negative impacts even worse. I love birds, and want to keep them around
The two photos of mine that were removed were not of nests at all. They showed the exterior of Red-throated Bee-eater nest holes in a stream-cut bank. One photo was of the bank showing the many holes (no birds), and was taken with telephoto lens at a distance of about 20 meters. The other photo showed an adult perched at the entrance of it's hole, holding an insect in its beak. The bird was about to take the insect into the tunnel to feed to its young at the inner end. The young birds were far into the burrow, and could not be seen from the exterior. This photo was taken with telephoto 13-14 meters from the bird and the opening of its nest hole. Flash was not used for either photo. The birds did not alter their behavior as I approached my shooting position. I do not think that the removal of these photos was fair.
Top bird guides often take serious photographers who use long telephoto lenses to such sites. The individual guiding me in Uganda where these photos were taken was a dedicated bird conservationist who was deeply concerned about the protection of birds. His livelihood depended on healthy bird populations; he would not have wanted to harm the birds.
Why not add a minimum photographing distance to the Bird Forum rule? Any other suggestions?
Last edited: