Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!
Zeiss - Always on the lookout for something special – Shop now

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Bluethroat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Wednesday 12th October 2016, 21:17   #1
kuzeycem
Turkish Birder
 
kuzeycem's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Turkey
Posts: 630
Bluethroat

Taken on 8 April 2016 at 09:20. Approximate distance 4-5 meters. Shot taken by crawling on the grass for about a meter (you can see my reflection on its iris:).
EXIF:
Body: Canon EOS 7D
Lens: Canon EF 400mm f5,6
F Number: 7,1
Exposure Bias: 0 EV
Shutter Speed: 1/800
ISO: 400
Edited in Adobe Photoshop Elements 13. The original photo was quite overexposed so I had to do some significant edits in levels and highlights, though nothing that changed the nature of the photo. Also minimal amount of sharpening and noise reduction (close distance with 400 ISO meant very little noise, even with a 7D!) and minimal color adjusting.
Photo is fullHD so it might not look good on Birdforum.
4 things I don't like about this image:
a) No prominent perch, like a rock or branch etc. Just grass which made both focusing difficult, and also fails to put bird on the foreground.
b) Background is also far from plain as once again the bird was on grass and that is never good for a clean patternless background.
c) The feet of the bird is obscured by some grass which makes the bird look a little... plump I guess? I mean it just doesn't look sleek and elegant like a Bluethroat should :)
d) Okay, this is not about the photo but I really wish my model was an adult male instead of this... 1st summer male, I guess? I could also use some more visible throat (thus blue) than seen in this profile view.

I would really like to hear your opinion on this photograph. If you think it's just great or perfect write so, if not and you don't like something about it PLEASE do write. I like constructive comments the most.

I can send the full version and original image if requested.

Cheers
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	m2_edited-5.jpg
Views:	223
Size:	138.7 KB
ID:	601570  
__________________
Latest World Tick: Spotted Crake (Porzana porzana) 428
Latest Turkish Tick: Spotted Crake (Porzana porzana) 350
Latest Patch Tick: Finsch's Wheatear (Oenanthe finschii) 163
kuzeycem is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 13th October 2016, 20:48   #2
KenM
Registered User
 
KenM's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London
Posts: 10,677
Hi Kuzycem,

Can't fault the bird or the resolution, simply stunning!....If it were possible, I'd have visually centred the subject in the width and depth....always remember to have a little bit more background beneath the subject, than you have at the top.

Cheers
KenM is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 13th October 2016, 22:11   #3
KC Foggin
Super Moderator
BF Supporter 2019
 
KC Foggin's Avatar

 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Myrtle Beach SC "Smiling Faces, Beautiful Places"
Posts: 249,874
Actually, I think this beautiful image is composed beautifully giving it a bit more space in the direction the bird is facing. As far as I'm concerned, not critiquing is necessary on this lovely image.
__________________
KC a/k/a common KC

Karma - What you send out
Comes right back at ya
KC Foggin is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Saturday 15th October 2016, 18:26   #4
ChrisKten
It's true, I quite like Pigeons
 
ChrisKten's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London UK
Posts: 59,264
Honest Critique is hard to come by online - I miss a (long dead) forum I joined that provided honest critique, as you learn nothing from "Great capture"

You get two different opinions on this site - one is from Birders, the other is from Photographers... here's an amateur photographer's opinion:
  • Composition obeys the rules (off centre eye - subject looking into space)
  • Maybe better with a bit more space (if available) at the bottom where the hidden feet are (usually aim to show where hidden feet etc are, although I've no idea how short this bird's legs are, so perhaps moot).
  • Low angle works quite well, but if you could have got even lower it would perhaps have improved the background (depends what was in the distance above the level of the grass and how long the grass was)
  • I agree that the background is a bit messy, but it's the natural setting the subject was in, so I'm fine with that.
  • Perhaps slightly over-sharpened, but could be the HD
  • Depending on your Lens/Sensor, maybe a larger aperture would have improved the DOF and bokeh, as the subject is small and side-on. Although maybe that very slight twist of it's head needed the F7.1?

All in all a nice image, and a good-looking bird
ChrisKten is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 15th October 2016, 18:55   #5
kuzeycem
Turkish Birder
 
kuzeycem's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Turkey
Posts: 630
Thank you all. I really love it when people give constructive criticism.
As for the position of the bird in the frame I tried to follow the more-space-where-the-bird-is-looking rule. You may be right about the feet but I also am not sure where they would stand exactly.
The over-sharpening part is, as you guessed, due to the fact that Birdforum compresses HD photos. On full resolution I can assure you it looks better.
For the bokeh and f-stop I agree with you :)
__________________
Latest World Tick: Spotted Crake (Porzana porzana) 428
Latest Turkish Tick: Spotted Crake (Porzana porzana) 350
Latest Patch Tick: Finsch's Wheatear (Oenanthe finschii) 163
kuzeycem is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bluethroat Pavel Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature 15 Saturday 14th May 2016 09:16
Bluethroat age-sex-ss0 kuzeycem Bird Identification Q&A 2 Sunday 10th April 2016 08:53
Bluethroat? bittern Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature 17 Monday 28th March 2011 19:05
My First Ever Bluethroat. Brian Du Bretagne Your Rarities 9 Monday 26th April 2010 09:05
Bluethroat Macswede Bird Identification Q&A 3 Tuesday 12th September 2006 17:44

{googleads}

Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Help support BirdForum

Page generated in 0.26018095 seconds with 18 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:33.