• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Dark backed Gull on the Thames? (1 Viewer)

KenM

Well-known member
Found this yesterday late afternoon, certainly the darkest backed graellsii that I've ever seen, thus discounting fuscus,......intermedius was my next port of call.

However am unsure as to whether the pp still has some growth to follow, as the distance between tail end and pp appears somewhat short?

Comments welcome.

Cheers
 

Attachments

  • P1800185.jpeg  Intermedius.jpg
    P1800185.jpeg Intermedius.jpg
    90.5 KB · Views: 99
Sorry if this sounds stupid as I am new to the world of gulls but why can't the bird be a fuscus. In my book fuscus is shown as being identical to your pictured bird as far as I can see.
 
I'd go for intermedius - which is quite frequent in Britain, unlike fuscus, which is very rare and should also be a bit blacker :t:
 
Sorry if this sounds stupid as I am new to the world of gulls but why can't the bird be a fuscus. In my book fuscus is shown as being identical to your pictured bird as far as I can see.

Certainly not a stupid question Louis P, as was mine....regarding the "short" primary projection, which I'd have thought would have been at odds with fuscus?

Cheers
 
Thanks for the help. Looking carefully I do see now that is more grey than a fuscus and I see what you mean about the primary projection. In my book the intermedius is shown having a slightly shorter primary projection as your bird does display. It also notes an intermedius 'can be as black as Great Black-Backed Gull' which again suits your bird well. Now I just need to nail those other 'dark winged larger gulls' one day...
 
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top