postcardcv said:I looked through a pair a few days ago - as you would expect with Leica the optical quality is amazing. As for how they compare to other bins - I was very impressed and the fact that they are noticably lighhter weight than the current Leica models should help them to compete with ELs. Shape and look of them is much like the Leica Duovids, they are very comfortable in the hand.
If you get the chance look through them - though be warned you may well be tempted.
Raptor said:One thing is for sure, the top three binos in the marketplace, Swaro, Leica, Zeiss, hold value better than all the rest, if you strike a good bargin when first purchasing, take good care, after several years, when you go sell, it is suprising how much you can get for them, in some cases 80% plus. The same applies to scopes. Raptor.
It's a pity that Al's dealer didn't show him the Nikon HGs
John Cantelo said:I've since had a good look at the Ultravids and came away very impresssed. I can't didn't notice any play in the focus wheel and can't believe that leica would produce anything less than 100%. Personally, I find the old 8/10x42s unusable due to their excessive weight & 'anti-ergonomic' design. The new bins, by contrast are superbly balanced, a delight to hold and on the light side for quality 40/42 roofs (although a close focus of 3m is a bit long for butterfly watchers). Optically I still think the Nikon HG roofs have a very, very slight edge, but given their bulk the new Leicas just have the advantage overall. It's a pity that Al's dealer didn't show him the Nikon HGs 8/10x32s which are both cheaper (Wharehouse Express have them for £499!) and, in my view, a little sharper & brighter!
John
Chas Zoss said:Has anyone seen or heard any thing about the new bonoculars from Leica? How do they compare to Zeiss victorys or the Els. thanks Chas
scampo said:This month's Birdwatching magazine (I think) reviewed the Ultravids and gave them 9.5/10 in all departments.