Will $60 really buy a "great" bino?
No, but $100 would do nicely. The '60' was in UK Pounds.
Considering field curvature, distortion, eye relief, baffling, color rendition, chromatic aberration, coatings and short cuts taken to make a bigger profit, I'm a bit leary. Of course, It really comes down to what an observer views as "great."
I used 'great' as opposed to 'excellent'.
Well, the:
Leupold Yosemite 6x30 (usually ~$90)
Leupold Yosemite 8x30
LL.Bean/Bushnell Explorer 8x25 (only $50)
Nikon Acculon 211 7x35 (often ~$70)
Nikon Acculon 8x40
The Aforemention Redfield Renegade 8x36
Olympus 8x25 and 8x21 Roamer
All comport themselves very well in those categories.
I'm not sure you understand how widespread the new coatings have become.
They were on the Yosemites long ago.
The Yosemites and LL.Bean definitely class as near excellent for sharpness.
The Bean focuser exceeds any I've used going for any price.
The Acculon 211 has notable curvature, but it's an extra-wide and a lot of fun.
You can very fine things under $100, more and more recent years.
After the Meos, I can pocket the little Beans and be quite satisfied.
If you find Yosemites distasteful to look through....you need anti-depressants ;-)
They're great. Yosemite 8x30 with hoods can trump an Monarch 5 for me.
Yosemite 6x30s aren't quite Meopta 6.5x32s, but I can have a great time at the
hockey game or the concert with them. The Meos are not going to a concert.
Note that the Yosemites started out at about $130 almost 10 years ago.
The binocular market has been fiercely competitive for some time now.
Oddly enough, the worst baffling was on the premium binocs 3 years ago.
Some weird hubris brought on by coatings/brightness obsession maybe.