• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

S. Africa - Common Fiscal or Fiscal Flycatcher? (1 Viewer)

BobbyJim

Well-known member
I'm struggling again. I think I have it and then look again and change my mind.
I'm going for 1 -3 to be flycatchers and 4 & 5 to be fiscals. Ask me again in five minutes and I'll have changed my mind again.
Expert help required please.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2719 (Copy).JPG
    IMG_2719 (Copy).JPG
    208.9 KB · Views: 18
  • IMG_3092 (Copy).JPG
    IMG_3092 (Copy).JPG
    137.5 KB · Views: 15
  • IMG_3141 (Copy).JPG
    IMG_3141 (Copy).JPG
    177.6 KB · Views: 11
  • IMG_3542 (Copy).JPG
    IMG_3542 (Copy).JPG
    164.6 KB · Views: 18
  • IMG_4638 (Copy).JPG
    IMG_4638 (Copy).JPG
    206.9 KB · Views: 13
You are correct, look at the bill : flycatchers show a thin, flat bill and fiscal (shrike) show a slightly hooked, thick bill.
 
Thanks Valery. Your time and effort in replying to my post is much appreciated.
I am pleased that somehow I succeeded in getting the fiscals and the flycatchers correct. I'm also pleased to have photographed a Hartlaub's Gull but a tad disappointed not to have a slender-billed gull. However, they are listed as rare vagrants in South Africa which is why I wasn't confident in my ID.
Thanks again,
Bob
 
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top