-
Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.
Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Gruiformes (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter njlarsen
- Start date
Peter Kovalik
Well-known member
Peter Kovalik
Well-known member
Richard Klim
-------------------------
Haase & Ilyashenko 2012
H&M4 tentatively recognises lilfordi Sharpe, 1894 ("May not be diagnosable; see Archibald & Meine (1996)"); but includes archibaldi Ilyashenko, 2008 in nominate grus ("not considered taxonomically valid without further investigation"), and korelovi Ilyashenko & Belyalov, 2011 in lilfordi.
IOC recognises lilfordi and archibaldi.
Related thread: New form of Common Crane.
Grus grus is treated as monotypic by Archibald & Meine 1996 (HBW 3) and eBird/Clements.
H&M4 tentatively recognises lilfordi Sharpe, 1894 ("May not be diagnosable; see Archibald & Meine (1996)"); but includes archibaldi Ilyashenko, 2008 in nominate grus ("not considered taxonomically valid without further investigation"), and korelovi Ilyashenko & Belyalov, 2011 in lilfordi.
IOC recognises lilfordi and archibaldi.
Related thread: New form of Common Crane.
Last edited:
Peter Kovalik
Well-known member
Common Crane
E. A. Mudrik, T. A. Kashentseva, P. S. Redchuk, D. V. Politov. Microsatellite variability data confirm low genetic differentiation of western and eastern subspecies of common crane Grus grus L. (Gruidae, Aves). Molecular Biology. March 2015, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 260-266.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
E. A. Mudrik, T. A. Kashentseva, P. S. Redchuk, D. V. Politov. Microsatellite variability data confirm low genetic differentiation of western and eastern subspecies of common crane Grus grus L. (Gruidae, Aves). Molecular Biology. March 2015, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 260-266.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
l_raty
laurent raty
Common Crane morphology & systematics (recent works in Russian)
An attempt to have all the references in a single place...
Ильяшенко В.Ю. 2008. Новая форма журавля из Закавказья. Русск. орнитол. журн. 17(412):559-562.
Ilyashenko V.Yu. 2008. A new form of crane from Transcaucasia. Russk. ornitol. zhurn. 17(412):559-562.
[pdf]
Ильяшенко В.Ю., Касабян М.Г., Маркин Ю.М. 2008. Морфологическая изменчивость серого журавля – Grus grus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Aves: Gruidae). Журавли Евразии (биология, распространение, миграции), 3:50-82.
Ilyashenko V.Yu., Kasabyan M.G., Markin Yu.M. 2008. Morphological variability of the Common Crane - Grus grus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Aves: Gruidae). Cranes of Eurasia (biology, distribution, migration), 3:50-82.
[pdf]
Ильяшенко В.Ю., Белялов О.В. 2011. Новый подвид серого журавля Grus grus korelovi ssp. n. (Aves: Gruidae) из Центрального и Восточного Тянь-Шаня. Русск. орнитол. журн. 20(687):1803-1811.
Ilyashenko V.Yu., Belyalov O.V. 2011. A new subspecies of the Common Crane Grus grus korelovi ssp. n. (Aves: Gruidae) from Central and Eastern Tien-Shan. Russk. ornitol. zhurn. 20(687):1803-1811.
[pdf]
Винтер С.В., Маркин Ю.М, Мевес В. 2011. Географическая изменчивость размеров яиц и некоторых параметров внешней морфологии серого журавля. Журавли Евразии (биология, распространение, миграции), 4:41-77.
Winter C.V., Markin Yu.M., Mewes W. 2011. Geographical variability of egg size and of some parameters of external morphology of the Common Crane. Cranes of Eurasia (biology, systematics, migration), 4:41-77.
[pdf]
Ильяшенко В.Ю. 2011. О систематике серого журавля. Журавли Евразии (биология, распространение, миграции), 4:93-103.
Ilyashenko V.Yu. 2011. On the systematics of the Common Crane. Cranes of Eurasia (biology, systematics, migration), 4:93-103.
[pdf]
Ильяшенко В.Ю. 2012. О распространении тибетского серого журавля (Grus grus korelovi). Орнитол. вестн. Казахст. Средн. Азии, 1:42-47.
Ilyashenko YB.u. 2012. On the distribution of the Tibetan Common Crane (Grus grus kerelovi). Ornitol. vestn. Kazakhst. Sredn. Azii, 1:42-47.
[on Issuu]
Винтер С.В., Маркин Ю.М., Кашенцева Т.А. 2016. О некоторых фенотипических особенностях серого журавля Grus grus. Русск. орнитол. журн. 25(1241):269-299.
Winter S.V., Markin Yu.M., Kashentzeva T.A. 2016. On some phenotypic features of the Common Crane Grus grus. Russk. ornitol. zhurn. 25(1241):269-299.
[pdf]
(The image that seems to emerge is that archibaldi would by far be the most distinct; korelovi requires more study; the east-west variation in northern populations (lilfordi-grus) seems largely clinal, making recognition of lilfordi questionable.)
An attempt to have all the references in a single place...
Ильяшенко В.Ю. 2008. Новая форма журавля из Закавказья. Русск. орнитол. журн. 17(412):559-562.
Ilyashenko V.Yu. 2008. A new form of crane from Transcaucasia. Russk. ornitol. zhurn. 17(412):559-562.
[pdf]
Ильяшенко В.Ю., Касабян М.Г., Маркин Ю.М. 2008. Морфологическая изменчивость серого журавля – Grus grus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Aves: Gruidae). Журавли Евразии (биология, распространение, миграции), 3:50-82.
Ilyashenko V.Yu., Kasabyan M.G., Markin Yu.M. 2008. Morphological variability of the Common Crane - Grus grus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Aves: Gruidae). Cranes of Eurasia (biology, distribution, migration), 3:50-82.
[pdf]
Ильяшенко В.Ю., Белялов О.В. 2011. Новый подвид серого журавля Grus grus korelovi ssp. n. (Aves: Gruidae) из Центрального и Восточного Тянь-Шаня. Русск. орнитол. журн. 20(687):1803-1811.
Ilyashenko V.Yu., Belyalov O.V. 2011. A new subspecies of the Common Crane Grus grus korelovi ssp. n. (Aves: Gruidae) from Central and Eastern Tien-Shan. Russk. ornitol. zhurn. 20(687):1803-1811.
[pdf]
Винтер С.В., Маркин Ю.М, Мевес В. 2011. Географическая изменчивость размеров яиц и некоторых параметров внешней морфологии серого журавля. Журавли Евразии (биология, распространение, миграции), 4:41-77.
Winter C.V., Markin Yu.M., Mewes W. 2011. Geographical variability of egg size and of some parameters of external morphology of the Common Crane. Cranes of Eurasia (biology, systematics, migration), 4:41-77.
[pdf]
Ильяшенко В.Ю. 2011. О систематике серого журавля. Журавли Евразии (биология, распространение, миграции), 4:93-103.
Ilyashenko V.Yu. 2011. On the systematics of the Common Crane. Cranes of Eurasia (biology, systematics, migration), 4:93-103.
[pdf]
Ильяшенко В.Ю. 2012. О распространении тибетского серого журавля (Grus grus korelovi). Орнитол. вестн. Казахст. Средн. Азии, 1:42-47.
Ilyashenko YB.u. 2012. On the distribution of the Tibetan Common Crane (Grus grus kerelovi). Ornitol. vestn. Kazakhst. Sredn. Azii, 1:42-47.
[on Issuu]
Винтер С.В., Маркин Ю.М., Кашенцева Т.А. 2016. О некоторых фенотипических особенностях серого журавля Grus grus. Русск. орнитол. журн. 25(1241):269-299.
Winter S.V., Markin Yu.M., Kashentzeva T.A. 2016. On some phenotypic features of the Common Crane Grus grus. Russk. ornitol. zhurn. 25(1241):269-299.
[pdf]
(The image that seems to emerge is that archibaldi would by far be the most distinct; korelovi requires more study; the east-west variation in northern populations (lilfordi-grus) seems largely clinal, making recognition of lilfordi questionable.)
Last edited:
Peter Kovalik
Well-known member
TiF Update July 10, 2016
Cranes: The genus Grus has been split into three genera: Leucogeranus, Antigone, and Grus, as in H&M-4. Further, the deep division between the crowned cranes and the rest is recognized by putting the crowned cranes in subfamily Balearicinae. AOU recognizes at least one more genus (Anthropoides).
Cranes: The genus Grus has been split into three genera: Leucogeranus, Antigone, and Grus, as in H&M-4. Further, the deep division between the crowned cranes and the rest is recognized by putting the crowned cranes in subfamily Balearicinae. AOU recognizes at least one more genus (Anthropoides).
Peter Kovalik
Well-known member
Peter Kovalik
Well-known member
Nutcracker
Stop Brexit!
Does that mean that Wattled Crane becomes Buggeranus :eek!: :eek!: :eek!: again?
mb1848
Well-known member
It might become Bugeranus Gloger 1842. I thought you made this up but here it is.
http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/48241#page/50/mode/1up .
Lets all agree on Laomedontia Reich. 1852 From HBW Alive Key to Bird Names, Gr. λαιμος laimos throat; δονεω doneō to shake. Less ugly.
http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/48241#page/50/mode/1up .
Lets all agree on Laomedontia Reich. 1852 From HBW Alive Key to Bird Names, Gr. λαιμος laimos throat; δονεω doneō to shake. Less ugly.
Nutcracker
Stop Brexit!
Oh dear, it acquired a surplus 'g' in my post above, I wonder how that could have happened?? 3
But yep, Bugeranus Gloger 1842 is the genus it always used to be in, until it was shown that excluding it (and Anthropoides) from Grus left Grus paraphyletic. Now it seems they want get monophyly by splitting Grus into numerous tiny genera instead. Not sure it's a good idea!
But yep, Bugeranus Gloger 1842 is the genus it always used to be in, until it was shown that excluding it (and Anthropoides) from Grus left Grus paraphyletic. Now it seems they want get monophyly by splitting Grus into numerous tiny genera instead. Not sure it's a good idea!
Peter Kovalik
Well-known member
Antigone antigone
Nevard, T. D., Haase, M., Archibald, G., Leiper, I., Van Zalinge, R. N., Purchkoon N., Siriaroonrat, B., Latt, T. N., Michael Wink, Garnett, S. T.: Subspecies in the Sarus Crane Antigone antigone revisited; with particular reference to the Australian population. Plos One, April 16 (2020).
Abstract:
Subspecies are often less well-defined than species but have become one of the basic units for legal protection. Evidence for the erection or synonymy of subspecies therefore needs to be founded on the best science available. Here we show that there is clear genetic disjunction in the Sarus Crane Antigone antigone, where previously the variation had appeared to be clinal. Based on a total sample of 76 individuals, analysis of 10 microsatellite loci from 67 samples and 49 sequences from the mitochondrial control region, this research establishes that the Australian Sarus Crane A. a. gillae differs significantly from both A. a. antigone (South Asia) and A. a. sharpii (Myanmar and Indochina). A single sample from the extinct Philippine subspecies A. a luzonica clustered with A. a. gillae, hinting at the potential for a more recent separation between them than from A. a. antigone and A. a. sharpii, even though A. a. sharpii is closer geographically. The results demonstrate that failure to detect subspecies through initial genetic profiling does not mean discontinuities are absent and has significance for other cases where subspecies are dismissed based on partial genetic evidence. It could also be potentially important for sourcing birds for reintroduction to the Philippines.
[pdf]
Nevard, T. D., Haase, M., Archibald, G., Leiper, I., Van Zalinge, R. N., Purchkoon N., Siriaroonrat, B., Latt, T. N., Michael Wink, Garnett, S. T.: Subspecies in the Sarus Crane Antigone antigone revisited; with particular reference to the Australian population. Plos One, April 16 (2020).
Abstract:
Subspecies are often less well-defined than species but have become one of the basic units for legal protection. Evidence for the erection or synonymy of subspecies therefore needs to be founded on the best science available. Here we show that there is clear genetic disjunction in the Sarus Crane Antigone antigone, where previously the variation had appeared to be clinal. Based on a total sample of 76 individuals, analysis of 10 microsatellite loci from 67 samples and 49 sequences from the mitochondrial control region, this research establishes that the Australian Sarus Crane A. a. gillae differs significantly from both A. a. antigone (South Asia) and A. a. sharpii (Myanmar and Indochina). A single sample from the extinct Philippine subspecies A. a luzonica clustered with A. a. gillae, hinting at the potential for a more recent separation between them than from A. a. antigone and A. a. sharpii, even though A. a. sharpii is closer geographically. The results demonstrate that failure to detect subspecies through initial genetic profiling does not mean discontinuities are absent and has significance for other cases where subspecies are dismissed based on partial genetic evidence. It could also be potentially important for sourcing birds for reintroduction to the Philippines.
[pdf]
Jim LeNomenclatoriste
Je suis un mignon petit Traquet rubicole
Is the extinct genus Antigone Gray, 1847 (Mollusca, Veneridae) a misspelling or an emendation of Antigona Schumacher, 1817 ?
mb1848
Well-known member
To my mind , Gray's use of the word cannot be taken into consideration . In effect , Gray did not propose Antigone as a new name for a mollusc , he only included " Antigone " Schumacher , 1817 , in the synonymy of Chione .
The Austral Avian Record .
The Austral Avian Record .
Jim LeNomenclatoriste
Je suis un mignon petit Traquet rubicole
Indeed and, IMO, this seems to me to be a lapsus calami
l_raty
laurent raty
pt.12-15 (1844-1847) - Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London - Biodiversity Heritage Library
The Biodiversity Heritage Library works collaboratively to make biodiversity literature openly available to the world as part of a global biodiversity community.
As you say, (1) not demonstrably intentional (see ICZN 33.2.1), hence must be treated as an incorrect subsequent spelling, not as an emendation, and cannot be available; and (2) not used as a valid name (in the synonymy of Chione Mergele), hence could only be available if it had been adopted as a valid name by some subsequent author before 1961 (ICZN 11.6.1), which probably did not happen.
raymie
Well-known member
Antigone is extinct? Aren't the Sandhill and Sarus Cranes classified in that genus?
Jim LeNomenclatoriste
Je suis un mignon petit Traquet rubicole
Raymie Raymie Raymie, read the family name in parentheses x)
raymie
Well-known member
How was the genus Antigone for cranes allowed to be given in 2010 then, given it was an already existent animal genus?
Similar threads
