• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Explorer 8x42 Review (1 Viewer)

Troubador

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Retailing at £219 and $299 Opticron’s Explorer WA ED Oasis-C+ (let’s just call it Explorer) 8x42 enters the market at a tempting price point. It costs enough to promise a useful performance but not enough to make your eyes water. In the UK it competes with Vortex’s Diamondback at £199 and Hawke’s Endurance ED at £210 while in the States it faces Nikon’s Monarch 5 at $277 and Bushnell’s Legend L at $280 (both of these are priced somewhat higher in the UK at ££250 and £270-£320 respectively).

Comparing fields of view, at 131m and 393ft it equals the Vortex, betters the 129m / 387ft Hawke and comfortably exceeds the Nikon’s 110m / 330ft while all of them trail behind the Bushnell’s 142m / 426ft.

At 140mm / 5.5” long it is as compact as the Bushnell with the others all being a little longer by 3-7mm / 0.12”- 0.28”. To put these in perspective, Swarovski’s EL is 160mm / 6.3” long which means all of these models are very compact and in the same league as the ‘king of compact’, Leica’s Ultravid HD+ which measures 142mm / 5.59”

Weight-wise the Explorer scales at 670g / 23.6ozs which means it is the heaviest here, the other models coming in at 666g / 23.6ozs for the Bushnell, 590g / 20.8 ozs for the Nikon, 652g / 23ozs for the Hawke and finally, 618g / 21.8ozs for the Vortex. However, the range from the lightest to the heaviest is only 80g / 2.8 ozs, and of course one man’s bino that is a bit heavy is another man’s bino with a better perceived build quality.

As usual I have some critical remarks about the rainguard. It only attaches at one side whereas if it could attach at both it would give everyone a choice of left-handed, right-handed, or both-sides attachment, and the strap does not allow enough room to pull the guard up and away from the bino, so if you are right-handed it is always dangling down in the way of your right hand as you try to grab a quick view of a fast bird. Moreover, while the deep cups of the rainguard give great protection during transport and storage they have too-small an internal diameter and suck onto the eyecups so strongly that you can pick the binos up by the rainguard and shake it about and the binos will not drop out. This means during rain, getting the guard quickly on and off the eyecups is a struggle. However, there are many straps and rainguards available on the accessories market so this is hardly a factor to deter anyone.

As usual Explorer comes with a cleaning cloth in a neat plastic wallet with sound cleaning advice on it, a neat and helpful touch.

Picking them up they have the usual neat and comfortable feel of an Opticron and their compact dimensions mean they handle comfortably. The focus wheel turns smoothly and without free-play and focuses at a nicely judged speed of 1.0 complete turn to refocus from my test object 4km / 2.5m away to a target in my office just 2m away. This is about the same speed as a Zeiss SF or Bushnell Legend M. The dioptre adjustment is on the right-hand optical tube in the usual place and the collar has a small protuberance on it that enables your thumb to take a more active role in moving it. The setting was reliable and didn’t shift during field use.

The eyecups have three positions and all of them were reliable in use and down at the other end it was noticeable that the objectives are well-recessed which is good for glare control. The eye relief and eyecup combination worked fine for me wearing spectacles. I could see the full field of view and didn’t experience any problems.

Out on the heaths, marshes and reed-beds of the English county of Suffolk a look at tree tops against bright pale clouds revealed that chromatic aberration is very well controlled, with just a tiny bit at the field edge, which was a nice surprise at this price level. The view is bright with realistic colours as amply demonstrated on my first day out with them when they captured a Peregrine Falcon coming in off the sea and looking like a bandit with its dark hood and moustaches. The Explorer clearly has good contrast and sharpness, and it dealt nicely with the subtle and complex plumage of a Short-eared Owl that obligingly wafted over the marsh in the late afternoon. The delicate buff of the underwing was clear and the black crescents about halfway along the underwing stood out in the low sunlight like huge parentheses as it floated away from the marsh and circled to investigate an old pile of cut reeds, no doubt looking for a vole or two.

A few days later the Explorer again demonstrated its capabilities when a perfect Reed Bunting decided to perch and enjoy the spring sunlight about 10 metres away. As with the Peregrine the contrast between the black hood and throat patch with the surrounding white plumage was stunning and the complex mantle plumage of warm browns and blacks was all sharply rendered.

The Explorer delivers a neatly judged performance in a compact package that handles nicely too. Is there anything that I would improve? Well, there are things that could be improved on all binos and when this product is upgraded in the future I would ask Opticron to increase the size of the sweet spot a bit. I don’t want to make too much of this though as it never entered my mind when I was watching all the birds mentioned above and the Marsh Harriers, Great White Egrets and Goldeneyes that I saw on other days.

In short the Explorer represents an attractive prospect for those with a budget of just over £200 or just short of $300 and looking for a compact 42mm bino. If this sounds like you, then put Explorer on your short list and try it out.

Lee
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2780 Red.jpg
    IMG_2780 Red.jpg
    158.3 KB · Views: 142
Great review, you really can't go wrong with Opticron.

Years ago I had the original Explorers, I think they were the first bin I got after my old faithful Bushnell nature view porros finally gave up the ghost. I remember being rather surpised though how these new fangled modern looking roof prisms of mine were clearly not as sharp as my ancient fungus ridden Bushnell's.
I'm sure the new version is considerably improved though.
 
Nice review as usual Lee,

A good friend who I go Birding with regularly has been using an Explorer C coat for a little over two years now in 10x42 format, I like it a lot, in fact the 10x has a very competitive 6.5 deg fov giving a very pleasant afov.

Given the superb (in my personal experience) customer care offered by Opticron I can`t think of another 42mm roof prism in this price bracket I`d buy over the Explorer.

Amazing what £200 ish pounds can get you these days.
 
Thanks Mulli and John for your kind words. We are fortunate in having a company like Opticron well-established in the UK. They have been doing for decades what Tract, Maven and Vortex have begun doing much more recently in the States.

Lee
 
Hi Lee, Thanks for this review. I'm still looking around for some reasonably compact first bins for my son
He's quite big for 9 years old and growing fast. These sound,on the face of it, a nice choice for a good first purchase. Any thoughts?
 
Hi Lee, Thanks for this review. I'm still looking around for some reasonably compact first bins for my son
He's quite big for 9 years old and growing fast. These sound,on the face of it, a nice choice for a good first purchase. Any thoughts?

Hi Julian

If it would help we could meet up, you with your son, on a Saturday and you and he could try out the Explorer and also the Traveller 8x32 and Imagic 8x42.

I have sent you an email just to make sure you have the address so please let me know what you think. I can do most Saturdays over the coming month.

Cheers Lee
 
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top