I want a bino to slip in my pocket, toss in a backpack or keep on my belt for walking the dog, backpacking, climbing ect. I intend to use this binocular A LOT.
I have top notch 10x42s for birding, but I want something small, light and discreet for activities where optics aren't the main focus.
My budget is $500 USD so I was looking at Leica Trinovids or a Monovid. I was debating back and forth between a monocular or small binocular. I like the super small and light concept of a monocular; but, I think a binocular under 4" and 8 ounce or under would be fine.
Then I saw a used Swarovski 8x20 B N pop up locally for $350 USD. The guy sent me pictures, he has the box case and papers, they look absolutely mint. Serial # has it as a 2007 build, he says he never really used them and they look like it.
Is this a good buy? They seem like they fit my needs as they are under 4" and weigh 7.6 oz. Would it be better to just buy new Trinovids? Ultravids are out of my budget and the new Swarovski pockets are bigger and heavier (12 oz or so) even if they were in my budget.
I have top notch 10x42s for birding, but I want something small, light and discreet for activities where optics aren't the main focus.
My budget is $500 USD so I was looking at Leica Trinovids or a Monovid. I was debating back and forth between a monocular or small binocular. I like the super small and light concept of a monocular; but, I think a binocular under 4" and 8 ounce or under would be fine.
Then I saw a used Swarovski 8x20 B N pop up locally for $350 USD. The guy sent me pictures, he has the box case and papers, they look absolutely mint. Serial # has it as a 2007 build, he says he never really used them and they look like it.
Is this a good buy? They seem like they fit my needs as they are under 4" and weigh 7.6 oz. Would it be better to just buy new Trinovids? Ultravids are out of my budget and the new Swarovski pockets are bigger and heavier (12 oz or so) even if they were in my budget.
Last edited: