Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.
Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
The Nikon scope lens converter and the 105 f/4 Micro Nikkor is equivalent to a 10.5x26 monocular.
My much used Docter 10x25 binocular is a little better and gains about 0.3 magnitude in brightness. But it has two tubes.
The Nikon converter is certainly useful, and a photographer with a long good lens could make good use of it.
But I think dedicated scopes are better, at least the good ones.
I have received the Skywatcher eyepiece, but haven't had the time to dissect its shortcomings.
It is clearly much better than the eyepiece you reviewed above here, though.
The Skywatcher's AFOV is not bad at all, and the eye relief is actually too much.
Either there's a lens problem with the Nikkor lens, or there is noticeable truncation from the eyepiece.
The Nikkor is fine with ordinary eyepieces, but the image is flipped and reversed. With the Skywatcher erecting eyepiece, the view isn't noticeably better than with the Hama lens scope converter.
While it's sharp even at the FOV edge, its still dull with subdued colours and contrast, and also fairly dim.
Clearly, there's good reason for the big prism unit of spotting scopes. Lesson learned.