Eastern Yellow Robin (1 Viewer)

Richard Klim

-------------------------

• Mar 15, 2013

• #1

Pavlova, Amos, Joseph, Loynes, Austin, Keogh, Stone, Nicholls & Sunnucks (in press). Perched at the mito-nuclear crossroads: divergent mitochondrial lineages correlate with environment in the face of ongoing nuclear gene flow in an Australian bird. Evolution. [abstract]

Boles 2007 (HBW 12): Eopsaltria australis.

 

Richard Klim

-------------------------

• Apr 16, 2015

• #2

Pavlova et al 2013 pdf

Pavlova et al 2013. Evolution 67(12): 3412–3428. [pdf]

 

Last edited: Apr 16, 2015

Richard Klim

-------------------------

• Apr 16, 2015

• #3

Morales et al

Morales, Pavlova, Joseph & Sunnucks (in press). Positive and purifying selection in mitochondrial genomes of a bird with mitonuclear discordance. Mol Ecol. [abstract]

 

l_raty

laurent raty

• Apr 15, 2017

• #4

Morales, Pavlova, Sunnucks, Major, Amos, Joseph, Wang, Lemmon, Endler, Delhey. 2017. Neutral and selective drivers of colour evolution in a widespread Australian passerine. J. Biogeogr. 44:522–536.
[abstract & supp.mat.]

Morales, Sunnucks, Joseph, Pavlova. [in press.] Perpendicular axes of incipient speciation generated by mitochondrial introgression. Mol. Ecol.
[abstract] [BioRxiv preprint]

Morales, Pavlova, Amos, Major, Bragg, Kilian, Greening, Sunnucks. Mitochondrial-nuclear interactions maintain a deep mitochondrial split in the face of nuclear gene flow.
[BioRxiv preprint]

 

njlarsen

Gallery Moderator

Opus Editor

Supporter

• Jun 15, 2018

• #5

Eopsaltria australis chrysorrhos -- is this the correct form or should it be Eopsaltria australis chrysorrhoa?

Niels

 

delia todd

If I said the wrong thing it was a Senior Moment

Staff member

Opus Editor

Supporter

• Jun 15, 2018

• #6

Thanks Niels.

I can only see chrysorrhoa being used in the Clements 3rd edition.

A bit more searching reveals that Eopsaltria chrysorrhoa was the scientific name used by Clements for Northern Yellow Robin, that one seems to have been absorbed into Eastern?

I'll have to watch.... getting myself confused by them LOL.

I'll leave it to you to explain what the Taxonomy lot say, as it's usually too complicated for me!!

 

Paul Clapham

Well-known member

• Jun 15, 2018

• #7

njlarsen said:

Eopsaltria australis chrysorrhos -- is this the correct form or should it be Eopsaltria australis chrysorrhoa?

Click to expand...

Everybody has settled on chrysorrhos now. That's almost certainly because David & Gosselin (2002), the massive cleanup of gender agreement issues, said

202. Eopsaltria chrysorrhos Gould, 1869, must be spelt Eopsaltria australis chrysorrhos, and should not be changed to E. a. chrysorrhoa.

Click to expand...

 

njlarsen

Gallery Moderator

Opus Editor

Supporter

• Jun 15, 2018

• #8

Thanks Paul, that makes sense.

Niels