• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Picidae (1 Viewer)

Campephilus leucopogon x C. melanoleucus

Contreras-Chialchia AO, Smith P, 2014. A notable hybrid woodpecker (Campephilus leucopogon x melanoleucus) (Aves: Picidae) from Paraguay. Ornitologia Neotropical 25: 459-464.

[PDF]
 
Dufort

Dufort (in press). An augmented supermatrix phylogeny of the avian family Picidae reveals uncertainty deep in the family tree. Mol Phylogenet Evol. [abstract]
 
Dufort (in press). An augmented supermatrix phylogeny of the avian family Picidae reveals uncertainty deep in the family tree. Mol Phylogenet Evol. [abstract]

Matthew J. Dufort (in press):
Most genera recognized by Winkler et al. (2014) [#12] received strong support for monophyly; however, several genera were recovered as paraphyletic. Dryocopus galeatus clustered with Celeus [#60 and #64]with strong support, rather than with other Dryocopus. Campethera nubica was placed with other members of Campethera, but this clade also included Geocolaptes olivaceus; Geocolaptes has previously been placed sister to a more limited sampling of
Campethera (Benz et al., 2006; Fuchs et al., 2007; Fuchs et al., 2013; Fuchs et al., 2008; Webb and Moore, 2005). Finally, Melanerpes striatus was sister to the remaining Melanerpes and all members of Sphyrapicus, though this placement received only weak bootstrap support.

Moore et al. (2011) found Colaptes rubiginosus to be paraphyletic, with individuals from Veracruz, Mexico sister to C. auricularis and those from Peru sister to C. atricollis. My analyses placed Guyana specimens of C. rubiginosus sister to C. atricollis to the exclusion of Peruvian C. rubiginosus, with strong support. South American C. rubiginosus are therefore paraphyletic, and this complex may include additional independent lineages.
 
Brett W. Benz, Mark B. Robbins, Kevin J. Zimmer. Phylogenetic relationships of the Helmeted Woodpecker (Dryocopus galeatus): A case of interspecific mimicry? bioRxiv, Posted July 31, 2015.

Brett W. Benz, Mark B. Robbins and Kevin J. Zimmer. Phylogenetic relationships of the Helmeted Woodpecker (Dryocopus galeatus): A case of interspecific mimicry? The Auk, Volume 132, Issue 4, pp.:938–950 (October 2015).

[Abstract]
[PDF]
 
Dufort, Matthew. (2015). Coexistence, Ecomorphology, and Diversification in the Avian Family Picidae (Woodpeckers and Allies). Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, http://hdl.handle.net/11299/175702.

To note that Geocolaptes has priority over Campethera.

How will they solve this problem ? Merge all into Geocolaptes or keep Geocolaptes and split Campethera into Stictopicus (or Stictocraugus) for C. nivosa, Cnipotheres for C. caroli and Campethera for the others ?
 
Now that the "dust has settled" looks like I will have to make a change in my woodpecker volume, "Woodpeckers, An Identification Guide", Winkler, Christie, Nurney.

Helmeted Woodpecker, no longer Dryocopus galeatus but now Celeus galeatus!
 
Picoides and Dendrocopos

Z.H. Huang, F.Y. Tu, X.J. Liao. DNA barcoding and phylogenetic relationships of genera Picoides and Dendrocopos (Aves: Picidae). Genet. Mol. Res. 14 (4): 18370-18375 (2015).

Abstract and PDF [here]
 
Would be interesting to know when the recent changes referring to some genera of the Picidae will be recognized by HBW alive.

Celeus increased from 11 to 14 species
Dryocopus decreased from 8 to 3 species

(see also Winkler et al Bird Families of the World 2015)
 
Would be interesting to know when the recent changes referring to some genera of the Picidae will be recognized by HBW alive.
Well, as far as I'm aware, there have been absolutely no taxonomic changes in HBW Alive since publication of Illustrated Checklist vol 1 in 2014 (with BirdLife presumably too preoccupied with work on overhauling the passerine taxonomy for vol 2). And even from 2017 (after publication of vol 2), I suspect that evolution of the systematics/taxonomy will never be particularly responsive/dynamic given the need to maintain consistency with the annual BirdLife/IUCN Red List updates. GMK et al have been doing an impressive job adding much extra detail to the non-passerine species accounts (including references to recent literature), but it's obvious that actually making any taxonomic changes has been strictly off-limits...
 
Last edited:
TiF Update

Dufort (in press). An augmented supermatrix phylogeny of the avian family Picidae reveals uncertainty deep in the family tree. Mol Phylogenet Evol. [abstract]

TiF Update May 21, 2016

Woodpeckers: A number of changes have been made based on Dufort (2016). As far as general organization is concerned, Nesoctitinae has been demoted to tribe Nesoctitini within Picidae; Chrysocolaptini has been separated from Campephilini; and Picoidini has been separated from Melanerpini. All seem to be among the deeper branches of the woodpecker tree. Changes within Picoidini are based on Fuchs and Pons (2015) and Dufort (2016). The arrangment of Celeus draws on Benz and Robbins (2011).

Generic changes include the following:

The African Piculet, Verreauxia africana, has been removed from Sasia. See H&M-4 and Dufort (2016).
The Speckled Piculet, Vivia innominata, has been removed from Picumnus. See Dufort (2016).
Campethera has been merged into Geocolaptes. Dufort (2016) found that the Ground Woodpecker, Geocolaptes olivaceus, is embedded in Campethera. Since Geocolaptes (Burchell, 1832) has priority over Campethera (G.R. Gray, 1841), the combined genus must take the name Geocolaptes.
The Helmeted Woodpecker belongs in Celeus, not Hylatomus. See Benz et al. (2015) and Lammertink et al. (2016).
The Hispaniolan Woodpecker is separated from Melanerpes as Chryserpes striatus. See Dufort (2016).
The Yellow-crowned Woodpecker moves to Leiopicus from Chloropicus. It's not entirely clear whether it is closer to Dendrocoptes or Chloropicus. See Fuchs and Pons (2015).
At the species level, there are two splits. Baird's Woodpecker, Campephilus bairdii, has been split from Ivory-billed Woodpecker, Campephilus principalis. See Fleischer et al. (2007) and Dufort (2016). Sooty Woodpecker, Mulleripicus funebris, has been split into Sooty Woodpecker / Southern Sooty-Woodpecker, Mulleripicus fuliginosus, and Funereal Woodpecker / Northern Sooty-Woodpecker, Mulleripicus funebris, based on Dufort (2016). Further, the Bronze-winged Woodpecker now includes the subspecies yucatanensis. As a result, it takes the scientific name Colaptes yucatanensis as yucatanensis (S. Cabot, 1844) has priority over aeruginosus (Malherbe, 1862). These two taxa may be separate species, but more study is need here and elsewhere in the Golden-olive complex.
 
To note that Geocolaptes has priority over Campethera.

How will they solve this problem ? Merge all into Geocolaptes or keep Geocolaptes and split Campethera into Stictopicus (or Stictocraugus) for C. nivosa, Cnipotheres for C. caroli and Campethera for the others ?

We can also split Chloropicus into several genera : Chloropicus (for C. namaquus, xantholophus and pyrrhogaster), Ipophilus (for I. obsoletus), Polipicus (for P. ellioti), Mesopicos (for goertae, spodocephalus and griseocephalus) and Dendropicos for the remaining species. I suggest.

Voilà ;)
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top