• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Minor on one Capito wallacei (1 Viewer)

The OD is [here].

Yes, I had assumed that you had taken the dates from the Key.

FWIW, there is an attorney called Robert B Wallace in Washington, DC (which is where the OD says the dedicatee was from): [here].
But he doesn't look like he has been dead for 15 years; and, if still active, he was presumably not born in 1936.
(OTOH, I don't known either where the information about the dedicatee's occupation (attorney) comes from; this detail is not in the OD.)
 
Last edited:
The Washington Post published a note about Robert Browne Wallace, after his death in 2002, "Robert Wallace dies", where it is said that the barbet (there called "Wallace's barbet") "bears his name".
But if the info in this note is correct, then he was not an attorney at all.
 
Last edited:
The Washington Post published a note about Robert Browne Wallace, after his death in 2002, "Robert Wallace dies", where it is said that the barbet (there called "Wallace's barbet") "bears his name".
But if the info in this note is correct, then he was not an attorney at all.

Talked with Dan Lane, and he says it is Robert Brown Wallace, that died in 2002.

Andy
 
Andy, I suppose this your "Dan Lane" is "Daniel F. Lane", one of the Authors of the OD (in 2000) ... or?

Just to be on the safe side. ;)

Yes it is. Also a sometimes contributor to this forum. I am also a coauthor on the description but was not at LSU when the name was decided.

Andy
 
Thanks, Andy.
Thus he was the son of the former VP, indeed.
(And not an attorney; meanwhile, he has ceased to be an attorney in the Key as well.)
 
Warning! This thread is more than 7 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top