Hi, everyone!
I want to upgrade from my SONY H5 to a DSLR. I thought of this combination:
Canon 400 D + tamron SP AF200-500mm F/5-6.3 Di LD (IF). What do you think?
Has someone the same comb.? Is there, maybe, a better lense?
Thank you in advance.
Hi, everyone!
I want to upgrade from my SONY H5 to a DSLR. I thought of this combination:
Canon 400 D + tamron SP AF200-500mm F/5-6.3 Di LD (IF). What do you think?
Has someone the same comb.? Is there, maybe, a better lense?
Thank you in advance.
Thank you all so much for your time.
I really think about CCRII,said!
Have you any internet adress for used equipment?
I am afraid there will always be a better lens but the main problem with post like this is that it could well attract the 'my lens is better than your lens' brigade.Hi, everyone!
I want to upgrade from my SONY H5 to a DSLR. I thought of this combination:
Canon 400 D + tamron SP AF200-500mm F/5-6.3 Di LD (IF). What do you think?
Has someone the same comb.? Is there, maybe, a better lense?
Thank you in advance.
You cannot deny DOC's results. Doesn't hurt that he/she is in Israel where it is sunny quite a lot of the year. I think that would help any lens sparkle..
Perhaps you are right ... I use a similar combo (350D) in sunny Italy, "where it is sunny quite a lot of the year" (?!?!?!?! ), yet this lens regularly provides me with far more light/speed than my 400mm f/5.6 + 1.4x TC combo, so my question is: why people in gloomy UK countryside, dark Canada woods, pitch-black jungle canopy etc etc should persevere in using this combo?
So your saying you use a Tampon er tamron 200-400 with a 350D and you find that combo to be better then the 400mm f/5.6 + 1.4x TC. The 1.4x tc does not work well with any lens less then f2.8 it will hunt and hunt. Even "where it's sunny quite a lot of the year" (lol).
So your saying you use a tamron 200-500 with a 350D and you find that combo to be better then the 400mm f/5.6 + 1.4x TC. The 1.4x tc does not work well with any lens less then f2.8 it will hunt and hunt. Even "where it's sunny quite a lot of the year" (lol).
Well, not exactly ... I was just referring to the "sunny ... any lens sparkle" bit .. mine was a kind of rhetorical reply, meaning that it's true that good lighting helps a lot in taking a good picture, but it's the man behind the camera doing all the rest: doc's pictures are regularly excellent, and that's mainly "because" of his skills, not "because" of the place he lives in ... Similarly, lots of good results are achieved by people using a "dark" kit (like my Canon combo: f/8) in bad lighting situations ...
As for the use of a TC, I wouldn't be so categorical in ruling out lenses with apertures less than f/2.8 to be used with a converter .. many of us here use them, and not all of us may enjoy the privilege of an f/2.8 lens ...
Cheers,
Max
Just for the record a 1.4x tc will work fine and AF very swiftly with a f4 lens too, I often use one on my 500 f4 and have not seen any noticeable slowing in the AF. As for using a taped 1.4x tc with an f5.6 lens, there are loads of people doing this and getting excellent results.
Reports suggest that the Kenko Pro 1.4tc (taped) works far better than the Canon when used with the 1-4 and 30D.Yeah I guess I should have been more clear. I meant that the 1.4x does not work very well with a f5.6 or higher lens. This is what it says in the information for the TC. I have only tested it with my 1-4 zoom and it is almost unusable. Maybe I have a bad copy.