• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

riquated ID Ethiopia (1 Viewer)

Lanhua

Well-known member
I took those pictures two weeks ago in Ethiopia on Lake Ziway.

The first bird is, I think African Thrush, but the second picture shows Mountain Thrush?



Regards

Mietek
 

Attachments

  • BB6I4889.JPG
    BB6I4889.JPG
    398.9 KB · Views: 65
  • DQ5R2209.JPG
    DQ5R2209.JPG
    449.7 KB · Views: 55
Hi Lanhua,

I think both of your photos are African Thrush.

If you use 'Birds of the Horn of Africa' then the picture of Mountain Thush is poor in that it doesn't capture the really strong colouration of this bird. The book 'Birds of Africa South of the Sahara' has a much better (more useful) illustration.

Mountain Thrush has a really orange bill, dark grey (not brownish) upperparts and head, and a greyish breast with a very orange belly and no white or beige colouration.

I think some races of African Thrush might look darker and more like Mountain Thrush than your birds, but I don't think the reverse is true - I don't think there are pale versions of Mountain Thrush.

See the two attached photos - one from Gondar, one from Bale (to show it's not a regional thing).
 

Attachments

  • 111231042 ET Gondar.jpg
    111231042 ET Gondar.jpg
    487.4 KB · Views: 27
  • 120106323 ET Bale.jpg
    120106323 ET Bale.jpg
    342.8 KB · Views: 19
Hi Lanhua,

I agree with MacNara, both your photos are the African Thrush. I see both African and Montane/Mountain/Abyssinian pretty regularly, and MacNara's description is spot on. The Mountain is easily identifiable by its overall darkerness compared with the paler African.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 5 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top