I note (from googling) that the Canon a590 is quite widely used for Digiscoping, and is considered something of a bargain.
Given that my (fairly beloved) Canon a630 had acquired some dirt inside its lens (no, I don't know how). I purchased a a590, and used it to take some holiday shots.
I was pretty disappointed.
This morning I took the same shot, in the same circumstances, with both my a630 and a590.
Here is a zoom down, and a 100% crop from both images; both are saved at 95% quality in Gimp, and the zoom down was bicubic.
(I TRIED to get these inline but VB codes seem not to work here)
whole frame, a630:
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f234/bugbear33/photo_tech/6302.jpg
100% Crop, a640:
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f234/bugbear33/photo_tech/6302crop.jpg
whole frame, a590:
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f234/bugbear33/photo_tech/5902.jpg
100% Crop, a590:
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f234/bugbear33/photo_tech/5902crop.jpg
Now, I can't quite put a technical description to what's happened, but at the observational level, the a590 shots are a good deal softer, verging on blurred, and the colours (especially in the roof tiles in the 100% crop) are less well shown.
My particular a590 is clearly less good than my particular a630. What I need to know is:
Do I have a duff a590 (which needs returning to the retailer), or is my a630 an unfair basis for comparison?
I don't have multiple spare a590 for comparison - but I'm hoping denizens here can help me out.
Comments keenly appreciated.
BugBear
P.S. I have tried my a590 with my Nikon Sprint Binoculars!
Given that my (fairly beloved) Canon a630 had acquired some dirt inside its lens (no, I don't know how). I purchased a a590, and used it to take some holiday shots.
I was pretty disappointed.
This morning I took the same shot, in the same circumstances, with both my a630 and a590.
Here is a zoom down, and a 100% crop from both images; both are saved at 95% quality in Gimp, and the zoom down was bicubic.
(I TRIED to get these inline but VB codes seem not to work here)
whole frame, a630:
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f234/bugbear33/photo_tech/6302.jpg
100% Crop, a640:
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f234/bugbear33/photo_tech/6302crop.jpg
whole frame, a590:
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f234/bugbear33/photo_tech/5902.jpg
100% Crop, a590:
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f234/bugbear33/photo_tech/5902crop.jpg
Now, I can't quite put a technical description to what's happened, but at the observational level, the a590 shots are a good deal softer, verging on blurred, and the colours (especially in the roof tiles in the 100% crop) are less well shown.
My particular a590 is clearly less good than my particular a630. What I need to know is:
Do I have a duff a590 (which needs returning to the retailer), or is my a630 an unfair basis for comparison?
I don't have multiple spare a590 for comparison - but I'm hoping denizens here can help me out.
Comments keenly appreciated.
BugBear
P.S. I have tried my a590 with my Nikon Sprint Binoculars!