|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
![]() |
#26 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Singapore
Posts: 81
|
Jan better than the 32x8 SV?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 3,507
|
Thanks Jan, I like the sound of that. The old one was a bit of a joke.
David |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: maarssen holland
Posts: 1,800
|
Hi SBB,
No, this one is not better than the 8x32SV, but compared to what is puts on the table it's a winner for me. In carrying it beats both the CL25 and SV32. It is optical superior to the 25. Considering price and performance it beats the S... out of both. Do you need the extra meters FOV and edgesharpness, the SV is your destiny but only in the 42 configuration because of the extra dusk and dawn advantage. This little gem is gonna take a lot of trade away from the CL25 and SV32 and much more from the competition. Work for Zeiss, Leica, Kowa and Meopta. IMHO this CL is the EL from 1999. It will fill the landscape. Jan |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Singapore
Posts: 81
|
Thanks for the Update Jan! Nice review
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
Moderator
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 7,278
|
Quote:
Lee |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: maarssen holland
Posts: 1,800
|
We've put the CL25 Mountain next to the new CL30 (in the same color) and imagined the 32SV and 42SV in the same color and came to the conclusion that it (hopefully) will be a matter of time they will come up in this color.
Yes, I like it a lot ![]() M |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Singapore
Posts: 81
|
https://mam.swarovski.com/pinaccess/...e=3TOvAN4ToEjo
More photos if anyone is interested |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Jonas Ridge, NC USA
Posts: 730
|
Oh gosh. Now I'm going to want one!
Hey I know-I'll say it's for my WIFE! Yeah...that's the ticket... It would be a step up from her only bin (a Leupold 6x32 Katmai) but still small for her hands. Yeah... ! ![]() Jan-do the Field Pro sockets on the side not interfere with a smooth comfortable grip though? They LOOK like they would but I'm picky sometimes.
__________________
. Hoping to retire by the end of 2018! So I can turn around and start my next career... (?) |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: maarssen holland
Posts: 1,800
|
Quote:
The palms of your hands don't reach that area. They are below that point because of the grip. Jan |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Jonas Ridge, NC USA
Posts: 730
|
Thanks Jan.
__________________
. Hoping to retire by the end of 2018! So I can turn around and start my next career... (?) |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 | |
Beth
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 2,498
|
Quote:
But, it looks very nice in those photos. *sigh* Swarovski...I'm not supposed to consider any new binos. CL was my 2nd fav bino I've owned. ' This new one has more ER and better specs and optics according to our first review. This is just too tempting. ![]() Never expected the CL to be upgraded. I made a promise to myself to keep it simple and have just 2 nice binos which I have now. ugh. |
|
![]() |
BF Supporter 2013 Support BirdForum With A Donation |
![]() |
#37 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 2,410
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#38 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: mile high, colorado
Posts: 833
|
Quote:
CG |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#39 | |
Beth
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 2,498
|
Quote:
Now I'm at a point where I feel pretty content having my living space de-cluttered...it feels good. I moved so much stuff I guess it's not so bad buying something small I would really enjoy. I'll never go back to having as much as I did. I really like having less clutter and unnecessary stuff - keeping it simple. I'll only buy things that I need or enrich my life in some way. Last edited by Gilmore Girl : Saturday 14th October 2017 at 01:53. |
|
![]() |
BF Supporter 2013 Support BirdForum With A Donation |
![]() |
#40 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: ND
Posts: 3,687
|
Quote:
Also a wool bag, like Meopta. Jan, you seem to be impressed, I wonder how the 10x30 would perform ? Where will actual prices be, USA ? Jerry |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: London Colney
Posts: 108
|
We saw the 10x30 this week and it sounds like Jan's opinion on this upgrade is pretty much the same as ours. It is a significant step up from the current Companion. This is going to sell very well.
The In Focus Team |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Klamath Falls, Oregon
Posts: 3,461
|
I know the SLC is long established and well respected. I personally think it is the best Swarovski. However the SLC line lost the 30 mm size at the upgrade from the SLC Neu. Shortly thereafter we see the CL in said size. I realize full well this may be just what it seems on its face, an update to the CL. The thought did run through my head that this may be a precursor to the addition of 40 mm size CL binoculars and possibly at the expense of the SLC, kind of a combination of the SLC and CL. Progress down this path may depend on user reaction to the new CL. Just a thought and I have no idea of where it may sit.
I find the eye box description pretty interesting. It may be something that relieves what appears to be persistent complaints from users about inadequate eye relief in the 30 mm size class.
__________________
Steve "Do what you can, where you are, with what you have" Teddy Roosevelt. |
![]() |
BF Supporter 2009 Support BirdForum With A Donation |
![]() |
#43 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,228
|
I had the 8x30 CL, the 8x32 SV and the 8.5x42 SV. Each increase in aperture brought a huge increase in performance. This new 8x30 CL may be improved but it still will not compete with it's bigger brother's if you want superior optics. The move from an 8x30 CL to an an 8x32 SV is almost insignificant in size and weight but huge in performance.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#44 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: maarssen holland
Posts: 1,800
|
Quote:
....huge in performance...., Based on what experience do you make this statement? We are talking about the new CL and I assume you about the old CL. Jan |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,228
|
The old CL. My point is even with the improvements on the new CL I don't see it to be any serious competition for the 8x32 SV. The new CL will be a nice smaller compact binocular for those people willing to sacrifice performance for those advantages. I have tried a lot of different 30mm binoculars and I have never found their performance good enough for a full time birding binocular under all conditions. They are fine as a secondary sunny weather daytime binocular but I wouldn't take one to the jungles of Costa Rica. I know I have tried them. They don't WORK good under the canopy. Give me a 42mm for all around use all around the world. The best 30mm I ever had optically was the Nikon 8x30 EII. Even with an optical box you still only have a 3.75mm exit pupil. It is too bad they couldn't make a 25mm or 30mm binocular perform like a 32mm or 42mm. That would be like having your cake and eating it too.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#46 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: maarssen holland
Posts: 1,800
|
Quote:
How can you make your point if you even have never looked through this CL? Jan |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Dartmoor.
Posts: 2,067
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#48 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NE Pennsylvania
Posts: 11,059
|
Quote:
I'm confused. ![]() Does "widening the incoming lightray" make the exit pupil larger? And what is an "optical box?" Bob |
|
![]() |
BF Supporter 2010 Support BirdForum With A Donation |
![]() |
#49 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: maarssen holland
Posts: 1,800
|
Quote:
I am as confused as you are. The explanation I got from Swarovski was that they made the lightrays, after entering the objectiv lenses, somehow wider resulting in a (what they call) optical box, situated direct after the eye lens, which gives the user the possibility to manipulate the binocular within the eyerelief from 0 - 21mm without experiencing blackouts/kidny beans. I know, it sounds like the "amazing" depth of field experience some have with the Noctivid (while there can't be ![]() Jan |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#50 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Nordschweiz
Posts: 301
|
Quote:
Isn’t it easier to speculate and talk „hands-off“ about binoculars that you have never seen than to comment on facts and features of a bino which you have had to inspect yourself ? ![]() |
|
![]() |
Advertisement |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Rate This Thread | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Companion CL 8x30 | wachipilotes | Swarovski | 2 | Monday 19th September 2016 21:59 |
New: Swaro. CL Companion Polaris | NDhunter | Swarovski | 7 | Wednesday 21st October 2015 18:34 |
A review of the CL Companion 8x30 | oetzi | Swarovski | 23 | Sunday 30th March 2014 17:14 |
New Swarovski CL Companion 8x30 / 10x30 | venezuelajoe | Swarovski | 0 | Thursday 11th August 2011 12:13 |