John, from what I see, it allows Swarovski to say it has 'improved' the SLC line (only cosmetically from what I see), and gives it the opportunity to jack up its prices on the SLC lines, and eventually adjust the prices upward on its EL and scopes as well to new price points! Maybe they'll mark down the old SLC binos models to half off!John Traynor said:I looked at the specs on the SLC 7X42 and did not see the changes I hoped for. The oppressive weight (33 oz) and short focus (13') have not changed. The bridge has been slightly modified, but I never found the old bridge problematic.
Is this just a marketing ploy?
John
karmantra said:John, from what I see, it allows Swarovski to say it has 'improved' the SLC line (only cosmetically from what I see), and gives it the opportunity to jack up its prices on the SLC lines, and eventually adjust the prices upward on its EL and scopes as well to new price points! Maybe they'll mark down the old SLC binos models to half off!
karmantra said:Maybe they'll mark down the old SLC binos models to half off!
CDK said:Also looked at the Leupold Gold Ring binoculars, IMO, sorry to you guys in the US, but they do not compete against the leading European binoculars.
Bill Atwood said:You will be able to use them to watch pigs fly when that happens.
Bill Atwood said:You will be able to use them to watch pigs fly when that happens.
henry link said:
AlanFrench said:I saw some pretty good prices on the older Nikon Venturers after the new version came out.
If improved efficiences, ease of repair, interchangable parts, and standardizing the SLC line are the driving force behind the new look, then one can hope that the pricing at least remains the same as with the old line--we'll have to wait and see. I have a pair of 8x30 SLCs, but after looking over the tech data on the new line, I'm in no hurry to trade up!elkcub said:Hold on guys. There may be aspects we don't fully appreciate, such as improved manufacturing efficiencies, ease of repair, or just interchangeable parts. Couple that with standardizing the appearance of the product line and improving the image, — and that's what being on top is all about. Ever hear someone complaining about Mercedes or BMW prices? If you don't like em, fine. Just buy a Ford.
-elk
karmantra said:If improved efficiences, ease of repair, interchangable parts, and standardizing the SLC line are the driving force behind the new look, then one can hope that the pricing at least remains the same as with the old line--we'll have to wait and see. I have a pair of 8x30 SLCs, but after looking over the tech data on the new line, I'm in no hurry to trade up!
Good point! If Swaro keep their prices the same on the new SLC line, it'll probably pick up sales of the line overall, and be viewed as a wise move on their part.elkcub said:I was just suggesting the "image" Swarovski may be trying to maintain, not the truth of it. Let's face it, there is snob appeal at work and they are well aware that Leica, Zeiss, and Nikon are in the same hi-end market. Like Karmantra and Johnathan I don't expect Swaros will be going on fire sale any time soon, but dealers will probably try to move their stock to make way for the new model. That's how I got sort of a bargain on my 8x30 Mk IIs back in 1994. Adding to what Karmantra said, they may actually be reluctant to make more than a cosmetic change for fear of hurting current SLC sales ... which I suspect is demographically to hunters. If that's the case, modernization is a smart business move since it reinforces the product line appeal to somewhat different groups; birders already have modern looking ELs, and hunters don't need short focus that much.
-elk