-
Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.
Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
swarovsli slc 10x50 (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Hati
- Start date
RobMorane
Well-known member
Seriously, if you want Alpha 10x, with high resolution, brightness etc, get the Swaro 10X56
(read Roger Vine's review).
Heavier and a bit bigger (you won't see much difference compared to a 50mm volume wise) but
you won't be disappointed.
Light transmission % is above the EL and they usually finish at the top of the tests.
If you don't have the budget, next choice are Zeiss Conquest 10x56.
(read Roger Vine's review).
Heavier and a bit bigger (you won't see much difference compared to a 50mm volume wise) but
you won't be disappointed.
Light transmission % is above the EL and they usually finish at the top of the tests.
If you don't have the budget, next choice are Zeiss Conquest 10x56.
NDhunter
Experienced observer
I have owned and used the 10x50 SLC Neu model, it was a later model with the updated coatings
for the series.
I found it a very good binocular, and it has the wow factor, very bright and with excellent sharpness.
The previous Swarovski SLC series, is a very capable performer, and compares well to many binoculars
today. It may be a step below the newest alphas, and so it is priced that way.
And believe me, it is not night and day between those mentioned.
Any 10x50 should be a good choice, but realize they are all heavier than 42mm models, so not for
everybody. The 10x50 SLC, is brighter than any 10x42 model.
I have not used the EL 10x50, but have owned the SV 8.5 EL for many years, also extensive experience
with the Zeiss SF 10x42.
My SF 10x42 has replaced the 10x50 SLC. I just find the lighter 42mm models more usable.
It all depends on your budget, and you are the one to decide.
Jerry
for the series.
I found it a very good binocular, and it has the wow factor, very bright and with excellent sharpness.
The previous Swarovski SLC series, is a very capable performer, and compares well to many binoculars
today. It may be a step below the newest alphas, and so it is priced that way.
And believe me, it is not night and day between those mentioned.
Any 10x50 should be a good choice, but realize they are all heavier than 42mm models, so not for
everybody. The 10x50 SLC, is brighter than any 10x42 model.
I have not used the EL 10x50, but have owned the SV 8.5 EL for many years, also extensive experience
with the Zeiss SF 10x42.
My SF 10x42 has replaced the 10x50 SLC. I just find the lighter 42mm models more usable.
It all depends on your budget, and you are the one to decide.
Jerry
stellarsseaeagle
Well-known member
Absolutely right certainly not the case of night and day.
I have owned the 10 x 50 SLC for many years and have looked through the more modern Swarovisions and there is not a lot of difference.
Certainly not to warrant changing if one already owns the older model.
The only disadvantage I find is the close focusing distance, which is not any good for butterflies.
I think the Swarovisions have become a bit of a fashion thing and birders like to have the latest model.
