• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

What are the German words for EL & SLC? (1 Viewer)

SeldomPerched

Well-known member
Assuming that model type abbreviations from Absam stand for German not English words I'd love to know the actual German words that EL & SLC stand for, as that may give a primary clue to the binoculars' intended purposes.

Or perhaps they don't stand for anything at all?!

Thank you,

Tom
 
Although Tom has asked an obvious and simple question, I don’t think that there is a completely clear answer!

While Swarovski’s letter designations for models were once abbreviations for significant features (e.g. with the SL and SLC binoculars, which I discuss below),
I don’t think this is necessarily still the case

For example, in current usage, the letter ‘L’ seems to be used primarily for branding consistency
It in effect indicates a Swarovski binocular verses either another Swarovski product line, or another brand of binocular
i.e. the obvious continuity of SL, SLC, EL, EL Range, CL Companion (x30) and CL Pocket (x25)

Swarovski also shows remarkable branding consistency when new designs are introduced:
- the EL Swarovsion of 2009 (radically new optics, similar body but differing in mechanical detail - see the attached image, especially re the hinges * )
- the SLC HD of 2010 (all new optics, mechanics, housing and covering)
- the new CL x30 of 2017 (new optics, body and covering)

Clearly an important component of Swarovski marketing is the stress on the continuity of it’s offerings i.e. building upon established favourable associations, including model names

* the image is from: http://www.fjbirds.org/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=16106 (however, the link has broken)



SL DESIGNATION
The SL was introduced in 1980, and essentially used the glass of the traditional Porro series binoculars (which are still in production), in a radical new housing
The SL made use of both sophisticated and complex assembly techniques, and then enclosed the plastic body shell components in a softer external covering
See the attached cross section (per Henry Link at: https://www.birdforum.net/showpost.php?p=2692087&postcount=67 )

It seems that SL stands for ‘Stossfest en Lange Lebensdauer’, which translates into English along the lines of ‘shockproof and long life’
This information is from Jan van Daalen’s, House of Outdoor site. See the page ‘Historie of Swarovski’: https://www.swarovskiverrekijkers.com/historie/
(I’m unsure if this information originates from Jan or from Gijs van Ginkel)
For convenience I’ve attached a Google translation of both the relevant section from the Dutch, and a translation of the specific phrase from the German


SLC DESIGNATION
Swarovski introduced their first roof prism binocular, the 8x30 W SLC in 1985. It used a different but similarly complex construction to that of the SL
And it’s original external styling was obviously modelled on that of the SL Porros
- see the image attached to the next post (it's from Gij’s, History of Swarovski: https://www.houseofoutdoor.com/verrekijkers/verrekijkers-testen-en-vergelijken/ )

The C indicated that this was the ‘SL Compact’ version - and certainly the x30 SLC was much more compact than the x42 and larger Porro SL’s
And similarly, the later x42, x50 and x56 models were relatively more compact than their SL Porro prism counterparts


EL DESIGNATION
The original EL was introduced in 1999, and it’s still possible to access Swarovski’s web pages from that time, via Wayback: http://web.archive.org/web/20001002040444/http://www.swarovskioptik.com/nf/us/hunting/el.htm
However, neither the initial EL page or the other pages such as Product Advantages, state specifically what EL stands for

In the ‘Historie of Swarovski’ that I’ve linked to above, the EL is referred to as ‘Extra Lite’ (see the entry for 1999), which is presumedly referring to the use of magnesium in the construction
However, the most obvious - and then both unique and radical - characteristic of the EL, was of course it’s physical design, which would suggest E is for ‘Ergonomic’


CL DESIGNATION
The CL Companion was introduced in 2011. A 2012 catalogue which first describes the model has no reference as to what the C indicates (nor the SLC or EL designations)
Perhaps C for ‘Compact’, especially verses its 8x32 EL counterpart?


So that’s about all I’ve got!
If anyone does have more specific information, I’d certainly be interested in it

John
 

Attachments

  • EL vs EL SV.jpg
    EL vs EL SV.jpg
    209.9 KB · Views: 40
  • SL Image.jpg
    SL Image.jpg
    190.1 KB · Views: 49
  • SL Origins.jpg
    SL Origins.jpg
    263.9 KB · Views: 28
  • SL Meaning.jpg
    SL Meaning.jpg
    24.7 KB · Views: 21
Last edited:
. . . and the final SLC image,
. . . along with an additional SL x40 for comparison
 

Attachments

  • SLC x30's.jpg
    SLC x30's.jpg
    155.5 KB · Views: 24
  • & SL comparison.jpg
    & SL comparison.jpg
    278.5 KB · Views: 23
Last edited:
John Roberts, posts 3 and 4,
The powerpoint History of Swarovski was presented by me during one of the conferences of the Binocular History Society and I published it on the WEB-site of House of Outdoor owned by Jan van Daalen, so any questions regarding this powerpoint can be addressed to me.
Gijs van Ginkel
 
Although Tom has asked an obvious and simple question, I don’t think that there is a completely clear answer!

While Swarovski’s letter designations for models were once abbreviations for significant features (e.g. with the SL and SLC binoculars, which I discuss below),
I don’t think this is necessarily still the case

For example, in current usage, the letter ‘L’ seems to be used primarily for branding consistency
It in effect indicates a Swarovski binocular verses either another Swarovski product line, or another brand of binocular
i.e. the obvious continuity of SL, SLC, EL, EL Range, CL Companion (x30) and CL Pocket (x25)

Swarovski also shows remarkable branding consistency when new designs are introduced:
- the EL Swarovsion of 2009 (radically new optics, similar body but differing in mechanical detail - see the attached image, especially re the hinges * )
- the SLC HD of 2010 (all new optics, mechanics, housing and covering)
- the new CL x30 of 2017 (new optics, body and covering)

Clearly an important component of Swarovski marketing is the stress on the continuity of it’s offerings i.e. building upon established favourable associations, including model names

* the image is from: http://www.fjbirds.org/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=16106 (however, the link has broken)



SL DESIGNATION
The SL was introduced in 1980, and essentially used the glass of the traditional Porro series binoculars (which are still in production), in a radical new housing
The SL made use of both sophisticated and complex assembly techniques, and then enclosed the plastic body shell components in a softer external covering
See the attached cross section (per Henry Link at: https://www.birdforum.net/showpost.php?p=2692087&postcount=67 )

It seems that SL stands for ‘Stossfest en Lange Lebensdauer’, which translates into English along the lines of ‘shockproof and long life’
This information is from Jan van Daalen’s, House of Outdoor site. See the page ‘Historie of Swarovski’: https://www.swarovskiverrekijkers.com/historie/
(I’m unsure if this information originates from Jan or from Gijs van Ginkel)
For convenience I’ve attached a Google translation of both the relevant section from the Dutch, and a translation of the specific phrase from the German


SLC DESIGNATION
Swarovski introduced their first roof prism binocular, the 8x30 W SLC in 1985. It used a different but similarly complex construction to that of the SL
And it’s original external styling was obviously modelled on that of the SL Porros
- see the image attached to the next post (it's from Gij’s, History of Swarovski: https://www.houseofoutdoor.com/verrekijkers/verrekijkers-testen-en-vergelijken/ )

The C indicated that this was the ‘SL Compact’ version - and certainly the x30 SLC was much more compact than the x42 and larger Porro SL’s
And similarly, the later x42, x50 and x56 models were relatively more compact than their SL Porro prism counterparts


EL DESIGNATION
The original EL was introduced in 1999, and it’s still possible to access Swarovski’s web pages from that time, via Wayback: http://web.archive.org/web/20001002040444/http://www.swarovskioptik.com/nf/us/hunting/el.htm
However, neither the initial EL page or the other pages such as Product Advantages, state specifically what EL stands for

In the ‘Historie of Swarovski’ that I’ve linked to above, the EL is referred to as ‘Extra Lite’ (see the entry for 1999), which is presumedly referring to the use of magnesium in the construction
However, the most obvious - and then both unique and radical - characteristic of the EL, was of course it’s physical design, which would suggest E is for ‘Ergonomic’


CL DESIGNATION
The CL Companion was introduced in 2011. A 2012 catalogue which first describes the model has no reference as to what the C indicates (nor the SLC or EL designations)
Perhaps C for ‘Compact’, especially verses its 8x32 EL counterpart?


So that’s about all I’ve got!
If anyone does have more specific information, I’d certainly be interested in it

John

John, thank you for this very comprehensive explanation of the development and naming of the various Swarovski models; much appreciated.

Tom
 
Gijs (post #5)

There are 2 different but similarly titled documents referred to in my post

1) Your PowerPoint presentation is what I linked to under my comments about the SLC designation

2) However, the link in my comments about the SL designation - specifically to the phrase ‘Stossfest en Lange Lebensdauer’ - is to a different page on Jan’s website
I downloaded the link sometime ago, and while the page does not seem to be currently listed on Jan’s site, the link still works!
It is this page for which I’m uncertain as to who is the author

John
 
Last edited:
Warning! This thread is more than 5 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top