[1] Hi all, but has anyone had any experience with camlink binoculars?
[2] The oakham 8x42 10x42 look pretty decent.
Rich
[1] I have the Camlink Rutland 8x42 binocular (and the Chinese-made Camlink CSP50 15-45X50 scope), which I bought when I started birdwatching. Neither has a serial number attached or impressed. The Rutland was Camlink's 8x42 model prior to the Oakham.
Binocular & scope both perform well for their price.
I paid from memory for the Rutland 8x42 binocular about £50 new special offer in 2010. At the time I think the lowest normal street price was about £80.
I felt when I received it that even at £80 it would have represented good value for money.
I've just compared the Rutland with more recent binocular purchases. It's at the level of optical & mechanical performance where for some people specification (magnification etc) and ergonomics (especially weight & dimensions) become equal determinants of their choice of purchase: ie:
* Reasonable build quality;
* Good resolution maintained for a good percentage of the radius of the field of view;
* Sufficient depth of focus for easy viewing;
* A smooth not too slow turning focus wheel;
* Adequate brightness and contrast of image for normal viewing conditions.
As the owner of a rebadged Kunming United Optics Corp. BW11 7x30, also bearing no serial number, I suspect the Rutland is a Chinese assembler's basic factory model as specified by Camlink to meet a good level of performance and build quality.
But the factories of other countries besides China may of course also supply binoculars without serial numbers for rebadging.
[2] There are so many good low-priced models of binocular now on the market, all at similar prices, that in your shoes, I would set a price, rather than a model, and buy the most attractive model at or near the price that comes along.
Stephen
Note: From Camlink's website it would appear that the only binocular they now market is the 8x21 Hobby