• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Scrubwrens & Mouse-warblers (1 Viewer)

Daniel Philippe

Well-known member
Norman J.A., Christidis L. & Schodde R., in press. Ecological and evolutionary diversification in the Australo-Papuan scrubwrens (Sericornis) and mouse-warblers (Crateroscelis), with a revision of the subfamily Sericornithinae (Aves: Passeriformes: Acanthizidae). Org. Divers. Evol.

Abstract
Understanding how the complex geotectonic and climatic history of the Australo-Papuan region has promoted the ecological and evolutionary diversification of its avifauna remains a challenge. Outstanding questions relate to the nature and timing of biogeographical connections between Australia and the emerging island of New Guinea and the mechanisms by which distinctive altitudinal replacement sequences have evolved amongst congeneric species in montane New Guinea. Here, we combine analyses of phylogenetic and eco-morphological data to investigate ecological and evolutionary patterns of diversification in the largely mesic-adapted Australo-Papuan scrubwrens (Sericornis) and mouse-warblers (Crateroscelis). We find evidence of ecological convergence and present a revised taxonomic and systematic treatment of the subfamily integrating information from new (ND2) and existing molecular phylogenetic reconstructions. Biogeographical connections indicate at least three phases of faunal interchange between Australia and New Guinea commencing in the mid to late Miocene. We also find little support for the proposed time dependency of ecological sorting mechanisms linked to divergence in foraging niche amongst altitudinal replacements. Instead, physiological adaptations to hypoxia and increased thermal efficiency at higher altitudes may better account for observed patterns of diversification in montane New Guinea. Indirect support for this hypothesis is derived from molecular clock calibrations that indicate a pulse of diversification across the Miocene-Pliocene boundary coincident with a phase of rapid mountain uplift. Simple ecological and climatic models appear inadequate for explaining observed patterns and mechanisms of diversification in the New Guinean montane avifauna. Further insights will require multidisciplinary research integrating geotectonic, palaeoclimatic, genetic, ecological and physiological approaches.

For instance C. nigrorufa is sister to S. spilodera.
 
Last edited:
We find evidence of ecological convergence and present a revised taxonomic and systematic treatment of the subfamily integrating information from new (ND2) and existing molecular phylogenetic reconstructions.

So what do they recommend? I don't have access to the paper
 
Taxonomic recommendation


Subfamily Sericornithinae Mathews 1946
Tribe Smicrornithini Schodde, Christidis and Norman, this work
Genus Smicrornis Gould 1843
Smicrornis brevirostris (Gould 1838)—Australia

Tribe Calamanthini Schodde, Christidis and Norman, this
work
Genus Calamanthus Gould 1838
Calamanthus fuliginosus (Vigors and Horsfield
1827)—coastal southeast Australia and Tasmania
Calamanthus montanellus Milligan 1903—southwest
Australia
Calamanthus campestris (Gould 1841)—central west
to central south Australia

Genus Hylacola Gould 1843
Hylacola pyrrhopygia (Vigors and Horsfield 1827)—
southeast Australia (west to Mt. Lofty-Flinders Ranges)
Hylacola cauta Gould 1843—southwest and central
south Australia (east to central Victoria and New South Wales)

Tribe Pyrrholaemini Schodde, Christidis and Norman, this
work
Genus Pycnoptilus Gould 1851
Pycnoptilus floccosus Gould 1851—southeast
Australia

Genus Pyrrholaemus Gould 1841
Pyrrholaemus brunneus Gould 1841—inland south
and central Australia
Pyrrholaemus sagittata (Latham 1801)—south and
central east Australia

Tribe Sericornithini
Genus Origma Gould 1838
Subgenus Origma
Origma (Origma) solitaria (Lewin 1808)—central
coastal New South Wales (sandstone formations)
Subgenus Crateroscelis Sharpe 1883
Origma (Crateroscelis) murina (P.L. Sclater
1858)—lowland to mid-montane New Guinea, satellite
islands
Origma (Crateroscelis) robusta (De Vis 1898)—
mid to upper montane New Guinea

Genus Neosericornis Mathews 1912
Neosericornis citreogularis (Gould 1838)—coastal
east Australia

Genus Aethomyias Sharpe 1879
Subgenus Bicolornis Schodde, Christidis and
Norman, this work
Aethomyias (Bicolornis) nigrorufus (Salvadori
1894)—mid to upper montane New Guinea
Subgenus Aethomyias
Aethomyias (Aethomyias) spilodera (G.R. Gray
1859)—lowland to mid-montane New Guinea, satellite
islands
Subgenus Arfakornis Mathews 1916
Aethomyias (Arfakornis) rufescens (Salvadori
1876)—lower to mid-montane New Guinea (Vogelkop)
Aethomyias (Arfakornis) perspicillatus (Salvadori
1896)—mid to upper montane New Guinea (central cordille-
ra, north coast ranges)
Aethomyias (Arfakornis) papuensis (De Vis
1894)—upper montane New Guinea (central cordillera)
Aethomyias (Arfakornis) arfakianus (Salvadori
1876)—lower to mid-montane New Guinea

Genus Sericornis Gould 1838
Subgenus Sinrocires Schodde, Christidis and
Norman, this work
Sericornis (Sinrocires) magnirostra (Gould
1838)—coastal east Australia (except Cape York Peninsula)
Sericornis (Sinrocires) beccarii Salvadori 1874—
Cape York Peninsula, Aru Is, lowland to lower montane south
and west New Guinea
Sericornis (Sinrocires) nouhuysi van Oort 1909—
mid to upper montane New Guinea
Subgenus Sericornis
Sericornis (Sericornis) maculatus Gould 1847—
southwest and central south Australia (east to South
Australian gulfs)
Sericornis (Sericornis) humilis Gould 1838—
Tasmania and King Is. (species identity of east Bass Strait
populations unresolved)
Sericornis (Sericornis) keri Mathews 1920—north-
east Queensland tablelands
Sericornis (Sericornis) frontalis (Vigors and
Horsfield 1827)—coastal east Australia (west to Mt. Lofty
Range and north to northeast Queensland)


Also, unlike them, I have treated Chthonicola as a subgenus of Pyrrholaemus
 
Last edited:
Scrubwrens and mouse warblers (Norman Christidis & Schodde); Sinrocires is a semi-palindrome of genus Sericornis; Bicolornis refers to the plumage of the Bicoloured Mouse Warbler.
 
Scrubwrens and mouse warblers (Norman Christidis & Schodde); Sinrocires is a semi-palindrome of genus Sericornis; Bicolornis refers to the plumage of the Bicoloured Mouse Warbler.

Sinrocires is an arbitrarily formed anagram of Sericornis, gender masculine.
Bicolornis is monospecific and endemic to mid-montane New Guinea. Its name is an arbitrary combination of letters derived from the English name for its species, ‘Bicoloured Scrubwren’, gender masculine.
(Note that, as per the above, Bicolornis does not end in the Greek word ορνις, it just ends like it coincidentally. (And, e.g., a family name formed from it should in principle be Bicolornidae, not Bicolornithidae.))

(Note also that all the new taxon names in the work are attributed to Schodde, Christidis & Norman, while the work itself is authored by Norman, Christidis & Schodde. I'm not clear how this type of attribution might be deemed protected under the Code, however.)
 
Last edited:
Despite the authors' intention Sinrocires is a semi-palindrome (i.e. Sericornis spelled backwards). Resicornis would be an arbitrarily formed anagram. I also fail to see how Bicolornis can be an arbitrary combination from "Bicoloured Scrubwren," unless they have thrown Sericornis in there somewhere. We can always rely upon Christidis and Schodde to entertain.
 
Last edited:
This type of statement is just an attempt to make the name independent from actual Greek/Latin grammar under the Code.

F.i., this ensures that the grammatical gender of Bicolornis will be the gender indicated by the author, whatever the actual gender of ὄρνις in Greek. In the present case, it might be argued that it doesn't really matter; but there have been cases where authors proposed generic names ending in a word of fixed gender in Greek/Latin, but declared these names to have another gender. In such cases, the final component is deemed to be Greek or Latin unless the authors had stated otherwise (Art. 26); and the gender of the name is thus in principle fixed by Greek/Latin grammar (under Art. 30.1), whatever the authors' original indication of gender. When this type of thing happens, the subsequent treatment of the name is likely to be inconsistent: some authors will treat the name in accordance to the original, but incorrect, indication; others will treat it in accordance to Greek/Latin dictionaries. Inconsistent treatment is not desirable. If the name is declared an arbitrary combination of letters, its gender is determined under Art. 30.2 instead of 30.1: classical Latin/Greek dictionaries become irrelevant, and (in most cases) an original indication of gender will have to be followed.

(This assumes the name does not "reproduce exactly a noun having a gender in a modern European language (without having to be transliterated from a non-Latin alphabet into the Latin alphabet)"; should this be the case, the name would take the gender of this noun in this language, whichever it is. This is because an original indication of gender for a name formed from words that are neither Latin nor Greek must only be accepted (as per Art. 30.2.2) only "unless Art. 30.2.1 applies". There are quite a few modern European languages...)

(This probably also assumes that biologists [or, more generally, users of biological names] are universally illiterate in Greek/Latin; if not, at least some of those "who know" will likely use the Greek/Latin gender anyway, and a consistent subsequent treatment will not necessarily follow.)
 
Last edited:
Sericornis maculatus

Norman J.A., Christidis L. & Schodde R., in press. Ecological and evolutionary diversification in the Australo-Papuan scrubwrens (Sericornis) and mouse-warblers (Crateroscelis), with a revision of the subfamily Sericornithinae (Aves: Passeriformes: Acanthizidae). Org. Divers. Evol.

IOC Updates Diary:

Jan 11 Revise scrubwrens to follow Norman et al. 2018

Jan 10 Accept split of Spotted Scrubwren
 
Garg, K.M., Chattopadhyay, B., Koane, B. et al. Last Glacial Maximum led to community-wide population expansion in a montane songbird radiation in highland Papua New Guinea. BMC Evol Biol 20, 82 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-020-01646-z

Abstract:

Background
Quaternary climate fluctuations are an engine of biotic diversification. Global cooling cycles, such as the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), are known to have fragmented the ranges of higher-latitude fauna and flora into smaller refugia, dramatically reducing species ranges. However, relatively less is known about the effects of cooling cycles on tropical biota.

Results
We analyzed thousands of genome-wide DNA markers across an assemblage of three closely related understorey-inhabiting scrubwrens (Sericornis and Aethomyias; Aves) from montane forest along an elevational gradient on Mt. Wilhelm, the highest mountain of Papua New Guinea. Despite species-specific differences in elevational preference, we found limited differentiation within each scrubwren species, but detected a strong genomic signature of simultaneous population expansions at 27-29 ka, coinciding with the onset of the LGM.

Conclusion
The remarkable synchronous timing of population expansions of all three species demonstrates the importance of global cooling cycles in expanding highland habitat. Global cooling cycles have likely had strongly different impacts on tropical montane areas versus boreal and temperate latitudes, leading to population expansions in the former and serious fragmentation in the latter.

[pdf]
 
Allan H. Burbidge, Gaynor Dolman, Kym Ottewell, Ronald Johnstone, and Michael Burbidge. 2021. Genetic and morphological relationships of fieldwrens (Calamanthus): implications for conservation status and management. Emu. Published online: 25 May 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01584197.2021.1922293

ABSTRACT
Sound taxonomy is important for providing a scientific basis for the listing of threatened taxa and allowing informed decisions for conservation management. The Australian fieldwrens (Acanthizidae: Calamanthus spp.), small passerines of shrublands across mesic to arid southern Australia, have been challenging in this respect. Difficulties in interpreting the variation in morphology and colouration across their geographic range have resulted in taxonomic controversy for a century; multiple arrangements of species and subspecies have been proposed, including a prevailing view that there are two species and seven subspecies in the Rufous Fieldwren, Calamanthus campestris complex. Two island subspecies (C. campestris hartogi and C. c. dorrie) are currently listed as Vulnerable. We hypothesised that C. campestris is monotypic (including C. montanellus) and that variation is clinal across mainland populations. Results of our genetic, morphological and colour pattern analyses are largely consistent with this hypothesis. However, we did find evidence of genetic divergence between eastern and western populations and some genetic support for recognition of C. c. hartogi (Dirk Hartog Island) based on divergence in nuclear allele frequencies. Together, our results provide a strong case for the hypotheses that C. montanellus is a synonym of C. campestris, and that rather than consisting of seven subspecies, C. campestris comprises two mainland subspecies C. c. campestris and C. c. rubiginosus east and west, respectively, of 133 degrees longitude, and only one island subspecies, C. c. hartogi. In this regard, the currently recognised C. c. dorrie is nominated for removal from threatened species lists.
 
Allan H. Burbidge, Gaynor Dolman, Kym Ottewell, Ronald Johnstone, and Michael Burbidge. 2021. Genetic and morphological relationships of fieldwrens (Calamanthus): implications for conservation status and management. Emu. Published online: 25 May 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01584197.2021.1922293

ABSTRACT
Sound taxonomy is important for providing a scientific basis for the listing of threatened taxa and allowing informed decisions for conservation management. The Australian fieldwrens (Acanthizidae: Calamanthus spp.), small passerines of shrublands across mesic to arid southern Australia, have been challenging in this respect. Difficulties in interpreting the variation in morphology and colouration across their geographic range have resulted in taxonomic controversy for a century; multiple arrangements of species and subspecies have been proposed, including a prevailing view that there are two species and seven subspecies in the Rufous Fieldwren, Calamanthus campestris complex. Two island subspecies (C. campestris hartogi and C. c. dorrie) are currently listed as Vulnerable. We hypothesised that C. campestris is monotypic (including C. montanellus) and that variation is clinal across mainland populations. Results of our genetic, morphological and colour pattern analyses are largely consistent with this hypothesis. However, we did find evidence of genetic divergence between eastern and western populations and some genetic support for recognition of C. c. hartogi (Dirk Hartog Island) based on divergence in nuclear allele frequencies. Together, our results provide a strong case for the hypotheses that C. montanellus is a synonym of C. campestris, and that rather than consisting of seven subspecies, C. campestris comprises two mainland subspecies C. c. campestris and C. c. rubiginosus east and west, respectively, of 133 degrees longitude, and only one island subspecies, C. c. hartogi. In this regard, the currently recognised C. c. dorrie is nominated for removal from threatened species lists.
This paper interest me
 
This type of statement is just an attempt to make the name independent from actual Greek/Latin grammar under the Code.

F.i., this ensures that the grammatical gender of Bicolornis will be the gender indicated by the author, whatever the actual gender of ὄρνις in Greek. In the present case, it might be argued that it doesn't really matter; but there have been cases where authors proposed generic names ending in a word of fixed gender in Greek/Latin, but declared these names to have another gender. In such cases, the final component is deemed to be Greek or Latin unless the authors had stated otherwise (Art. 26); and the gender of the name is thus in principle fixed by Greek/Latin grammar (under Art. 30.1), whatever the authors' original indication of gender. When this type of thing happens, the subsequent treatment of the name is likely to be inconsistent: some authors will treat the name in accordance to the original, but incorrect, indication; others will treat it in accordance to Greek/Latin dictionaries. Inconsistent treatment is not desirable. If the name is declared an arbitrary combination of letters, its gender is determined under Art. 30.2 instead of 30.1: classical Latin/Greek dictionaries become irrelevant, and (in most cases) an original indication of gender will have to be followed.

(This assumes the name does not "reproduce exactly a noun having a gender in a modern European language (without having to be transliterated from a non-Latin alphabet into the Latin alphabet)"; should this be the case, the name would take the gender of this noun in this language, whichever it is. This is because an original indication of gender for a name formed from words that are neither Latin nor Greek must only be accepted (as per Art. 30.2.2) only "unless Art. 30.2.1 applies". There are quite a few modern European languages...)

(This probably also assumes that biologists [or, more generally, users of biological names] are universally illiterate in Greek/Latin; if not, at least some of those "who know" will likely use the Greek/Latin gender anyway, and a consistent subsequent treatment will not necessarily follow.)
I also saw that these two names did not have Zoobank registration.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top