• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

The origin of avian flight (1 Viewer)

Fred Ruhe

Well-known member
Netherlands
Paolo S. Segre & Amanda I. Banet, 2018

The origin of avian flight: finding common ground

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, bly116 (advance online publication)

https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean...innean/bly116/5089924?redirectedFrom=fulltext

Abstract:


Few topics in evolutionary biology have been as controversial as the debate over the origin of avian flight. Although significant progress has been made in understanding how dinosaurs acquired flight, the debate remains mired in historical perspectives that prevent progress. We would like to renew the call to set aside the arboreal–cursorial debate and to draw attention to the common ground shared by both sides. To this end, we propose the following starting points: (1) Paravian dinosaurs were bipedal, with decoupled but complementary hindlimb and forelimb locomotion. (2) They had feathers on their body, their wings and in many cases their legs, that were probably highly plastic and multi-functional. (3) Paravians inhabited complex, three-dimensional environments that required proficiency in a variety of behaviours to negotiate. (4) Once the incipient wing form existed, asymmetric and symmetric flapping and possibly static wing postures served a variety of aerodynamic purposes that enhanced fitness. Taken together, these tenets conjure an exciting portrait of a dynamic organism adept at navigating through a complex environment with its versatile, incipient wings.


Keywords: arboreal, birds, cursorial, origin of flight, therapods

Enjoy,

Fred
 
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top