Richard Klim
-------------------------
Great research (as always!), Mark. :t:
Tree diagram now corrected to indicate transfer to Erythrina.Just noticed that although the taxonomic recommendations propose the transfer of Carpodacus erythrinus to Erythrina Brehm 1829, the tree diagram indicates transfer to Erythrospiza. I assume that the former is correct.
Zuccon, Prŷs-Jones, Rasmussen & Ericson (in press). The phylogenetic relationships and generic limits of finches (Fringillidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol.
Abstract
The phylogenetic relationships among the true finches (Fringillidae) have been confounded by the recurrence of similar plumage patterns and use of similar feeding niches. Using a dense taxon sampling and a combination of nuclear and mitochondrial sequences we reconstructed a well resolved and strongly supported phylogenetic hypothesis for this family. We identified three well supported, subfamily level clades: the Holoarctic genus Fringilla (subfamly Fringillinae), the Neotropical Euphonia and Chlorophonia (subfamily Euphoniinae), and the more widespread subfamily Carduelinae for the remaining taxa. Although usually separated in a different family-group taxon (Drepanidinae), the Hawaiian honeycreepers are deeply nested within the Carduelinae and sister to a group of Asian Carpodacus. Other new relationships recovered by this analysis include the placement of the extinct Chaunoproctus ferreorostris as sister to some Asian Carpodacus, a clade combining greenfinches (Carduelis chloris and allies), Rhodospiza and Rhynchostruthus, and a well-supported clade with the aberrant Callacanthis and Pyrrhoplectes together with Carpodacus rubescens. Although part of the large Carduelis-Serinus complex, the poorly known Serinus estherae forms a distinct lineage without close relatives. The traditionally delimited genera Carduelis, Serinus, Carpodacus, Pinicola and Euphonia are polyphyletic or paraphyletic. Following our results we propose a revised generic classification of finches and describe a new monotypic genus for Carpodacus rubescens.
SMNH.
Gonçalo C. Cardoso, Yang Hu & Paulo Gama Mota, 2012. Birdsong, sexual selection, and the flawed taxonomy of canaries, goldfinches and allies. Animal Behaviour, Volume 84, Issue 1, July 2012, Pages 111–119.
Abstract
I'm unsure why the material in diagram form illustrated with the Science Direct abstract is included on that web page given that it is totally unreadable. There may be some geek-knowledge that provides a simple method of getting round this problem, and I'd be grateful for any advice, but surely the prime purpose of the on-screen presentation is to garner interest and not to p### off visitors?
MJB:C
Revised classification of Fringillidae to be adopted in v3.3.Zuccon, Prŷs-Jones, Rasmussen & Ericson (in press). The phylogenetic relationships and generic limits of finches (Fringillidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol.
Revised classification of Fringillidae to be adopted in v3.3.
www.worldbirdnames.org/updates/taxonomy
Of note, a slightly broader Carpodacus than suggested by Zuccon et al – retaining erythrinus, and subsuming Haematospiza and Chaunoproctus....I note that Fringillidae have been shaken out thoroughly!
Of note, a slightly broader Carpodacus than suggested by Zuccon et al – retaining erythrinus, and subsuming Haematospiza and Chaunoproctus.
All were sampled by Zuccon et al, Mike. Presumably just down to individual judgement/preference when deciding how deeply to split genera – the comments note that George Sangster recommended the retention of erythrinus, and the phylogeny then dictates the inclusion of Haematospiza/Chaunoproctus.Due to lack of specimens of the latter two genera, making any split premature?
Conclusions
Our phylogenetic analysis of the New world goldfinches and siskins revealed that goldfinches and siskins form monophyletic, sister clades; we recommend goldfinches should be grouped in the genus Astragalinus while the New World siskins (including the single Old World species, Eurasian siskin) should be grouped together in the genus Spinus. We found evidence of mtDNA divergence between S. magellanicus of the Central Andes and the eastern lowlands, indicating that S. magellanicus is comprised of at least two species. ...