-
Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.
Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
A standardized digiscoping resolution test (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter JGobeil
- Start date
wileec
Member
Going to have to pass on the image request. Partly because it's not clear how to attach images and providing links works (and I'm not alone in doing it). Secondly, resampling an image compromises the info, so I don't get why you even want the images posted, given you are asking for them to be resampled.
For all of the reasons I have previously stated, I would suggest this "testing" only has relevance for a person to consider the options they have for their own setup. Too many variables being ignored and the sample number is far too small for any real comparison of one scope/camera setup to be compared to another. It would make about as much sense as considering any one person's review of a product on the B&H site to be THE WORD on a given product.
Given that I see so differently on the subject of testing, I'll likely pass on any more of this stuff - not worth the hassle and the lack of science that continually bothers me.
For all of the reasons I have previously stated, I would suggest this "testing" only has relevance for a person to consider the options they have for their own setup. Too many variables being ignored and the sample number is far too small for any real comparison of one scope/camera setup to be compared to another. It would make about as much sense as considering any one person's review of a product on the B&H site to be THE WORD on a given product.
Given that I see so differently on the subject of testing, I'll likely pass on any more of this stuff - not worth the hassle and the lack of science that continually bothers me.
