• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Neotropic & Double-crested Cormorants side by side (1 Viewer)

lagartos

New member
Here along the coast of Yucatán, México, one challenge in the winter is to distinguish our permanent resident Neotropic Cormorants from Double-crested ones, most of which are non-breeding winter visitors. Today I got a shot of the two species side-by-side. The color differences are not dependable, but the Neotropic is consistently smaller, and the posterior edge of the Neotropic's gular skin is pointed, while in the Double-crested it's not. In the Neotropic, often the gular skin is bordered with a thin or pale line, which is just forming in this individual.
 

Attachments

  • 150315cm.jpg
    150315cm.jpg
    37.8 KB · Views: 421
  • 150315cn.jpg
    150315cn.jpg
    24.6 KB · Views: 258
Also obvious here, Neotropical's yellow is only below the eye, whereas D-c has yellow in front of / above the eye as well, in two areas separated by a darker loral line :t:
 
Also obvious here, Neotropical's yellow is only below the eye, whereas D-c has yellow in front of / above the eye as well, in two areas separated by a darker loral line :t:

Actually, a small percentage of Neotropics have some orange in the supraloral area, many immature Double-cresteds have white bordering the bare skin at the gape and below, and this Neotropic doesn't seem to have quite the angled gape to which I'm accustomed.

DC with white by gape

DC with white by gape

Typical gape angle of Neotrop

Neotrop with orange in the supraloral area; note that the text of the article has the top and bottom right pictures mixed up
 
Last edited:
Warning! This thread is more than 9 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top