....
I wonder how many binoculars survive a 7ft drop, over 2 metres, onto a hard surface?
....
...
Post 39.
That was very difficult for me to do.
I suppose the lack of sleep from 3 days of stifling heat allowed me to just do it.
I did hope the binocular would survive.
I wonder how many binoculars survive a 7ft drop, over 2 metres, onto a hard surface?
B.
...Alexis is wrong.
This binocular is no longer useful for birdwatching...
This is nothing more than my best guess because I don't really know! I take the best care of my binoculars possible because I don't WANT an inadvertent "test" of their build quality. I will say after using various binoculars some kind of develop a feeling of being "mechanically well built."
In no order:
1. Swarovski SLC
2. Meopta Meostar
3. Leica UVHD+
4. Zeiss Conquest HD
Regarding the Meopta MeoStars, there was a cutaway unit on the Meopta stand at Bird Fair so you could see inside the optical tube. It was beautifully made and I was struck by the absence of obviously excessive thickness of metal to explain their sturdy weight but then I noticed the prism-cage. This looked super-robust and although I am not going to do a Binastro and start doing drop-tests, the cage looked really tough and don't think those prisms are going to start wandering even if subject to a hard knock. Very impressive internals.
Lee
Breaking binocs is childs' play for the Deutsche Bundespost.
I had a Nobilem Super serviced by Harald Ros, of CZJ fame. It arrived in such disarray that I had to send it back, repackaged, to Harald.
His report to me was that the prism mountings had been knocked out in transit, even though the glass had been well packed.
This is nothing more than my best guess because I don't really know! I take the best care of my binoculars possible because I don't WANT an inadvertent "test" of their build quality. I will say after using various binoculars some kind of develop a feeling of being "mechanically well built."
In no order:
1. Swarovski SLC
2. Meopta Meostar
3. Leica UVHD+
4. Zeiss Conquest HD
The Minolta 8x32 Mariner seems well built and robust. The Minolta is in their early script as on their earlier film cameras.
I just looked through it this afternoon and now and the image is good although dimmer than newer 8x32s.
Some ghosts but flare and glare control quite good.
I see the whole field easily but I don't use glasses.
Thin rubber eyecups about as new.
Minolta
8x32
7 degrees
Japan
JB 35 (Raito Koki Seisakujo Co.)
Q1069xx
Eyepieces single blue and multicoated surfaces.
Objectives single blue coated.
Optical windows uncoated.
Some internal uncoated surfaces
WR on front of focus knob.
Maybe this means water resistant? but I have heard that these may be waterproof.
It looks like my Foton or old Trinovid.
Feels a bit heavy, but handles well.
Still has well worn silver Japan sticker on right metal objective outer cover.
B.