SeldomPerched
Well-known member
This is a general question but I'm hoping it's OK to post it on the Zeiss forum as this particular brand caters particularly well for low light users with its A-K prism models, many of which have been discontinued but remain in wide circulation.
How much does the twilight factor hint at the comparative suitability of different specification binoculars for low light use? For instance a 7x42 Dialyt BG/AT*P(*) has a t/f of 17.15; so does of course a 7x42 Victory T*FL whereas the 8x56 T*FL sports a t/f of 21.17 and the 10x56 T*FL which has a smaller exit pupil than the 8x version just mentioned nevertheless has a higher t/f of 23.7 because of the higher magnification combined with the same 56mm objective diameter.
I can see the way the maths works but if we now factor in limitations on eye flexibility for the older user does the twilight factor still provide a clue to which binoculars will provide the most detail to that user in practice as the light is failing? And then again there are differences in transmission values and if those range between - say for sake of argument - 93% and 95% will that difference be enough to affect the order of the instruments' effectiveness in giving us the detail in the dull/twilight conditions?
(As an aside and for what it's worth - which is probably nothing - I sense more is apparent to me at dusk through an 8x42 HT than the 8x56 FL used in rapid succession. In the day time the HT gives me a washed, brighter view though the larger FL has the easier, more relaxed one.)
So after completing this post I'm wondering if there's a good reason why twilight factor is something that hardly gets mentioned in most posts I've seen regarding light gathering performance and the picking out of detail.
Tom
How much does the twilight factor hint at the comparative suitability of different specification binoculars for low light use? For instance a 7x42 Dialyt BG/AT*P(*) has a t/f of 17.15; so does of course a 7x42 Victory T*FL whereas the 8x56 T*FL sports a t/f of 21.17 and the 10x56 T*FL which has a smaller exit pupil than the 8x version just mentioned nevertheless has a higher t/f of 23.7 because of the higher magnification combined with the same 56mm objective diameter.
I can see the way the maths works but if we now factor in limitations on eye flexibility for the older user does the twilight factor still provide a clue to which binoculars will provide the most detail to that user in practice as the light is failing? And then again there are differences in transmission values and if those range between - say for sake of argument - 93% and 95% will that difference be enough to affect the order of the instruments' effectiveness in giving us the detail in the dull/twilight conditions?
(As an aside and for what it's worth - which is probably nothing - I sense more is apparent to me at dusk through an 8x42 HT than the 8x56 FL used in rapid succession. In the day time the HT gives me a washed, brighter view though the larger FL has the easier, more relaxed one.)
So after completing this post I'm wondering if there's a good reason why twilight factor is something that hardly gets mentioned in most posts I've seen regarding light gathering performance and the picking out of detail.
Tom
Last edited by a moderator: