• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Annapurna sanc trek (8) (1 Viewer)

testoduro

Well-known member
Hi, again, asking for info on confirming/id.ing these species. Pictures no. 1 and 2 were taken at 4200 mtr altitude.

1.Brown dipper.jpg

2.1-emberiza 3.jpg

3.1-1.jpg

1. Brown dipper?
2. A bunting?
3. White-rumped vulture?

Thank you again and again!
 
Last edited:
I'd go for Eurasian Wren. The 3 species of Wren-babbler (Scaly-breasted, Pygmy & Nepal) occurring in the area are virtually tailless, and the white markings on the vent and undertail fit a Wren.
 
Agree with wren, because tail is bit longer, habitat (among rocks and sometimes open, while wren-babblers nearly always in undergrowth) and altitude (wrenbabblers not above 3500m, I think)
 
Sorry for any confusion
(and sorry if it came across as critical of Andy A - I'm sure having a baby is enough to deal with!)

My comment was that the bird linked in Post #6 is a Streaked Wren-babbler. I wasn't suggesting that as an ID for the original photo - it's not in range, and habitat is wrong. My impression of the original post is that it's a Eurasian Wren.
 
Sorry for any confusion
(and sorry if it came across as critical of Andy A - I'm sure having a baby is enough to deal with!)

My comment was that the bird linked in Post #6 is a Streaked Wren-babbler. I wasn't suggesting that as an ID for the original photo - it's not in range, and habitat is wrong. My impression of the original post is that it's a Eurasian Wren.

I'm at least partly responsible for not looking a it properly, I did notice that none of the other 'Pygmy's had a tail so should have been alerted by that.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top