• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

AOS 61st supplement (1 Viewer)

it took a lot of wading through the paper to get to this bit:

Proposals considered but not accepted by the Committee included recognition of the columbid subfamily Starnoenadinae, change of the English name of Blue-headed Quail-Dove Starnoenas cyanocephala, separation of Garnet-throated Hummingbird Lamprolaima rhami into 2 species, recognition of Guanacaste Hummingbird Amazilia alfaroana as a species rather than a hybrid, separation of Ardea occidentalis from Great Blue Heron A. herodias, separation of Aegolius brooksi from Northern Saw-whet Owl A. acadicus, removal of “scrub” from the English names of the scrub-jays (Aphelocoma spp.), separation of Unicolored Jay Aphelocoma unicolor into 4 species, separation of Horned Lark Eremophila alpestris into 2 or more species, and change of the English name of Olive Warbler Peucedramus taeniatus to Ocotero.

Is the rational for these rejections published anywhere? I read the NACC proposals each year but never get to read the reasons for rejection or acceptance.

Ian
 
Is the rational for these rejections published anywhere? I read the NACC proposals each year but never get to read the reasons for rejection or acceptance.

Ian

Yes, AOS publishes the comments from committee members on the same webpages where it posts the proposals. Comments for the first set of 2020 proposals have not been posted yet (http://checklist.americanornithology.org/nacc/proposals/2020.html), but the ones for the 2019 proposals are available (http://checklist.americanornithology.org/nacc/proposals/2019.html) as are those for earlier years
 
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top