• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Pallid or Montagu's Harrier ID (1 Viewer)

FabK

New member
Hi
Would appreciate feedback about this tricky 3CY female Harrier. Pictures taken last week-end in the north-west of Switzerland.

Thanks for your comments.
 

Attachments

  • Busard1.JPG
    Busard1.JPG
    110.8 KB · Views: 377
  • Busard5.JPG
    Busard5.JPG
    128.9 KB · Views: 406
  • Busard8.JPG
    Busard8.JPG
    101.5 KB · Views: 328
  • Busard9.JPG
    Busard9.JPG
    77.6 KB · Views: 388
Compare with photo #3 in this post. Your bird doesn't show a nice 'collar' and appears rather plain on the underparts for a bird of this age, so would err towards Montagu's...

James
 
I agree on Montagu's Harrier. To me it looks more like 2cy than 3cy (it has moulted the body feathers and underwing coverts, but the remiges look still juvenile, as the secondaries are very dark both below and above).
 
I agree on Montagu's Harrier. To me it looks more like 2cy than 3cy (it has moulted the body feathers and underwing coverts, but the remiges look still juvenile, as the secondaries are very dark both below and above).

Also has a 'long hand' compared to the arm which rules out Pallid.

But note that some 2nd calendar Montagu's can look shorter winged so not always a good feature, apparently.

Cheers,

Andy.
 
In two of the pics, am I guilty of 'creative observation', or can a hint of barred second generation axilliaries be seen, which would be diagnostic of Montagu's vis-a-vis Pallid...?
It certainly looks like a 2cy bird to me also, for reasons stated by CAU.
Regards,
Harry
 
Warning! This thread is more than 14 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top