mb1848
Well-known member
Mr. Jobling says there are a few genus names from A through part of T in the Key he has still not seen the diagnosis. One mentioned was Philipinetta, the dignosis was available from a review of the original work. Bjorn rightly stated I had hijacked the Joko Windoo thread.
Here is another in its own thread:
In the Key it says “diagnosis not seen” for:
Sakesphorus (m.) Chubb 1918 Ann.Mag.Nat.Hist.(9) 2 p.123 from Zoonomen, 2 here means numbers 7-12. The diagnosis is not much.
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/71919#page/137/mode/1up .
Sakesphorus, nom. nov. pro Hypolophus Cab. And Hein. 1859 (nec Meuller & Henle) 1837 Type Lanius Canadensis Linneas 1766.
Mus. Hein: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/196137#page/24/mode/1up .
Here is another in its own thread:
In the Key it says “diagnosis not seen” for:
Sakesphorus (m.) Chubb 1918 Ann.Mag.Nat.Hist.(9) 2 p.123 from Zoonomen, 2 here means numbers 7-12. The diagnosis is not much.
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/71919#page/137/mode/1up .
Sakesphorus, nom. nov. pro Hypolophus Cab. And Hein. 1859 (nec Meuller & Henle) 1837 Type Lanius Canadensis Linneas 1766.
Mus. Hein: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/196137#page/24/mode/1up .