• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

TSN-550 durability (1 Viewer)

b-lilja

Well-known member
Curious about folks' thoughts about durability of these. I have broken two Nikon ED50s in too quick succession and just think they are too cheaply made for their own good - anyone have a sense of the Kowas? Obviously much more expensive than the ED50. This is for a second scope - Nikon ED82 is the biggie.
 
Afaik, the Kowa has a polycarbonate body, much as the Nikon. I'd not expect a massive difference in durability.

A new ED50 body is available for about $300, a fifth the price of the Kowa with its non exchangeable lens. Perhaps just consider the Nikon body a disposable?
 
Were the failures of the same component, I wonder? Failure of the helicoil was a well known problem early in its history. I think I've seen a photo of one which had come apart at the join. Ah, just found thread :
https://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=159829

Expect you already know there are a few "likely more rugged than ED50" alternatives to the Kowa if you consider it a bit pricey for the intended use :
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/compare/Kowa_TSN-553_15-45x55_PROMINAR_Spotting_Scope_Angled_Viewing_vs_Nikon_Fieldscope_ED50_13-30x50_Spotting_Scope_Angled_Viewing_vs_Opticron_MM4_50_GA_ED_45_12-36x_Travelscope_Angled_Viewing_vs_Vortex_Razor_HD_11-33x50_Spotting_Scope_Angled_Viewing/BHitems/1349418-REG_426150-REG_1335798-REG_999169-REG

More details :
https://www.opticron.co.uk/our-products/fieldscopes/mm4-travelscopes/mm4-50-ga-ed45-travelscope
https://vortexoptics.com/vortex-razor-hd-11-33x50-spotting-scope-angled.html

Best of luck.
 
I've just checked a Kowa brochure on the TSN-550 series, but can find no mention of the housing material. Also drew a blank on the German website. Externally they are very similar to the 880 series, so I would expect magnesium alloy but there are anomalies. The Genesis 22 and 44 binoculars have alloy housings, whereas the Genesis 33 is composite.

I had a brief look through a 553 at Photokina a couple of years ago and, while it is optically excellent, it's very expensive for such a small scope. The permanently attached zoom eyepiece has a rather narrow FOV and is by no means comparable to the TE-11WZ 25-60x wide-angle on the 880 series. Personally, I would have preferred it with a fixed focal length wide angle eyepiece giving around 25x magnification.

John
 
I've just checked a Kowa brochure on the TSN-550 series, but can find no mention of the housing material. Also drew a blank on the German website. Externally they are very similar to the 880 series, so I would expect magnesium alloy but there are anomalies. The Genesis 22 and 44 binoculars have alloy housings, whereas the Genesis 33 is composite.

I had a brief look through a 553 at Photokina a couple of years ago and, while it is optically excellent, it's very expensive for such a small scope. The permanently attached zoom eyepiece has a rather narrow FOV and is by no means comparable to the TE-11WZ 25-60x wide-angle on the 880 series. Personally, I would have preferred it with a fixed focal length wide angle eyepiece giving around 25x magnification.

John


The body material is polycarbonate according to Optics4birding.

https://www.optics4birding.com/kowa-tsn-553-15-45x55-prominar-angled-spotting-scope-body.html
 
Yep, the scope split right in half just like the one in that photo. It was a warranty replacement, only a couple months old. Not abused in any way.

Compared to my older Fieldscope IIs and IIIs, absolute POS. But it does work very well, when it works.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top